Loading...
A systematic review exploring the impact of social media on breastfeeding practices
Orchard, Lisa ; Nicholls, Wendy
Orchard, Lisa
Nicholls, Wendy
Authors
Editors
Other contributors
Affiliation
Epub Date
Issue Date
2020-10-09
Submitted date
Subjects
Alternative
Abstract
Social media has potential to promote and support positive health behaviours. This systematic review explores the influence of social media on breastfeeding decision-making, promotion and support. For the purpose of the review, social media was defined as social networking sites and blogs; M-technology and apps were only considered if they included an interactive element, such as a ‘share’ function, or one-to-many communication. Searches were conducted on EBSCO across seven databases (limited to 2007-2019). Of the 1261 papers initially identified, 22 met the inclusion criteria for the current review. Results are mixed, but there is evidence that social media can be used to improve breastfeeding awareness and attitudes. Breastfeeding mothers value pro-breastfeeding online communities. However, the success of such social media groups may be dependent on specific content shared, individual contributors, and group dynamics. Key considerations for practitioners are offered regarding how social media can augment services offered to support breastfeeding. Research in this field is still very much in its infancy. Further investigation of specific social media content is needed, alongside the viewpoints of those who have ceased breastfeeding against their wishes.
Citation
Orchard, L. and Nicholls, W. (2020) A systematic review exploring the impact of social media on breastfeeding practices, Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01064-w
Publisher
Journal
Research Unit
PubMed ID
PubMed Central ID
Embedded videos
Additional Links
Type
Journal article
Language
en
Description
This is an accepted manuscript of an article published by Springer, available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01064-w
The accepted version of the publication may differ from the final published version.
Series/Report no.
ISSN
1046-1310