The end of meaningful work in charities? A case study of ethics in employee relations
Abstract
Developed from meaningful work and business ethics, we investigate the motivational effect of meaningful work on paid staff (not volunteers) with a “shortage” of ethical employment practices situated in the Not-for-Profit sector. We tested the traditional notion of meaningful work by nature and by line manager support (under its business-like practices) to compensate for the “sacrifice” (low pay and job stress caused by poor employment terms) of front line staff working alongside professional managers paid the market rate. Using a mixed-method case study, we employed SEM modelling to analyse a staff survey of 125 valid responses and administrative records of staff resignation, alongside interviews. The results show that meaningful work by nature and by line manager support are positively and significantly associated with job satisfaction but neither has a significant effect on staff resignation action. There is no empirical evidence to support the compensating effect of meaningful work by nature; meaningful work by line manager support has a stronger effect only through reduced job stress, rather than compensating for the low pay, in preventing resignation. The qualitative analysis reveals that continued low pay and using precarious employment contracts have evoked the questioning of ethics of employment practices in this sector. We discuss the implications and suggest further areas of research.Citation
Wang, W., Seifert, R. (2022) The end of meaningful work in the not-for-profit sector? A case study of ethics in employee relations under the new business-like operation regime. Journal of Business Ethics, 181, pp. 1–14.Publisher
SpringerJournal
Journal of Business EthicsAdditional Links
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-021-04891-4Type
Journal articleLanguage
enDescription
This is an accepted manuscript of an article published by Springer in Journal of Business Ethics on 12/07/2021, available online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04891-4 The accepted version of the publication may differ from the final published version.ISSN
0167-4544ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1007/s10551-021-04891-4
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/