Response to the Comment by Armstrong and Welsman on ‘Developing a new curvilinear allometric model to improve the fit and validity of the 20-m shuttle run test as a predictor of cardiorespiratory fitness in adults and youth’

Nevill, Alan MRamsbottom, RogerSandercock, GavinBocachica-González, Carlos EduardoRamírez-Vélez, RobinsonTomkinson, Grant2021-05-272021-05-272021-05-20Nevill, A.M., Ramsbottom, R., Sandercock, G. et al. (2021) Response to the Comment by Armstrong and Welsman on ‘Developing a New Curvilinear Allometric Model to Improve the Fit and Validity of the 20-m Shuttle Run Test as a Predictor of Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Adults and Youth’. Sports Medicine 51, pp.1595–1597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01464-30112-164210.1007/s40279-021-01464-3http://hdl.handle.net/2436/624082This is an accepted manuscript of an article published by Springer in Sports Medicine on 20/05/2021, available online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01464-3 The accepted version of the publication may differ from the final published version.application/pdfenResponse to the Comment by Armstrong and Welsman on ‘Developing a new curvilinear allometric model to improve the fit and validity of the 20-m shuttle run test as a predictor of cardiorespiratory fitness in adults and youth’Other1179-2035Sports Medicine2021-05-25