Loading...
Evaluation of shared understanding in multidisciplinary architecture, engineering and construction design teams
McLoughlin, Brian ;
McLoughlin, Brian
Authors
Editors
Other contributors
Epub Date
Issue Date
2026-03-08
Submitted date
Files
Accepted manuscript under embargo until 8 March 2027
Adobe PDF, 801.26 KB
- Embargoed until 2027-03-08
Alternative
Abstract
Uncoordinated, incomplete building construction documents are resulting in added costs, extended schedules, and a reduction in the product quality. A suggested cause is that the multidisciplinary team who create the construction documents lack a shared understanding of the activities involved in the process. The aim of this study is to assess the current understanding of the disciplines during the construction document development stage in terms of processes and information development to determine the barriers and enablers to achieve shared understanding. Qualitative, semi-structured interviews were used to gather data from disciplines directly involved in construction document development and thematic analysis was used to apply themes to the transcripts. The results showed that one of the biggest barriers to achieving shared understanding is the procurement method of the consultants on lowest cost basis, as this leads to negative behaviours which greatly reduces the quality of the documents.
Citation
McLoughlin, B., Renukappa, S. (2026) Evaluation of shared understanding in multidisciplinary architecture, engineering and construction design teams. Architecture, Structures and Construction, 6 (1), Article no 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44150-026-00188-0
Publisher
Research Unit
PubMed ID
PubMed Central ID
Embedded videos
Additional Links
Type
Journal article
Language
en
Description
This is an accepted manuscript of an article published by Springer Nature in Architecture, Structures and Construction on 08/03/2026, available online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44150-026-00188-0
The accepted version of the publication may differ from the final published version.
This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: http://doi.org/10.1007/s44150-026-00188-0
Series/Report no.
ISSN
2730-9886
EISSN
2730-9894
ISBN
ISMN
Gov't Doc #
Sponsors
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.