Inverted BMI rather than BMI is a better proxy for percentage of body fat
Nevill, Alan M. Stavropoulos-Kalinoglou, Antonios Metsios, Giorgos S. Koutedakis, Yiannis Holder, Roger L. Kitas, George D. Mohammed, Mohammed A.
Nevill, Alan M.
Stavropoulos-Kalinoglou, Antonios
Metsios, Giorgos S.
Koutedakis, Yiannis
Holder, Roger L.
Kitas, George D.
Mohammed, Mohammed A.
Editors
Other contributors
Affiliation
Epub Date
Issue Date
2011
Submitted date
Alternative
Abstract
Background: Percentage of body fat (BF%) is a known risk factor for a range of healthcare problems but is difficult to measure. An easy to measure proxy is the weight/height2 ratio known as the Body Mass Index (BMI kg/m2). However, BMI does have some inherent weaknesses which are readily overcome by its inverse iBMI (1000/BMI, cm2/kg). Methods: The association between BF% and both BMI and iBMI together with their distributional properties was explored using previously published data from healthy (n ¼ 2993) and diseased populations (n ¼ 298). Results: BMI is skewed whereas iBMI is symmetrical and so is better approximated by the normal distribution. The relationship between BF% and BMI is curved, but that of iBMI and BF% is linear and thus iBMI explains more of the variation in BF% than BMI. For example a unit increase in BMI for a group of thin women represents an increase of 2.3% in BF, but for obese women this represents only a 0.3% increase in BF—a 7-fold difference. The curvature stems from body mass being the numerator in BMI but the denominator in BF% resulting in a form of hyperbolic curve which is not the case with iBMI. Furthermore, BMI and iBMI have different relationships (interaction) with BF% for men and women, but these differences are less marked with iBMI. Conclusions: Overall, these characteristics of iBMI favour its use over BMI, especially in statistical models
Citation
Annals of Human Biology
Publisher
Journal
Research Unit
PubMed ID
PubMed Central ID
Embedded videos
Additional Links
Type
Journal article
Language
en
Description
Published on-line ahead of print
Series/Report no.
ISSN
0301-4460
1464-5033
1464-5033