Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Item

Do females create higher impact research? Scopus citations and Mendeley readers for articles from five countries

Thelwall, Mike
Editors
Other contributors
Affiliation
Epub Date
Issue Date
2018-09-01
Submitted date
Alternative
Abstract
There are known gender imbalances in participation in scientific fields, from female dominance of nursing to male dominance of mathematics. It is not clear whether there is also a citation imbalance, with some claiming that male-authored research tends to be more cited. No previous study has assessed gender differences in the readers of academic research on a large scale, however. In response, this article assesses whether there are gender differences in the average citations and/or Mendeley readers of academic publications. Field normalised logged Scopus citations and Mendeley readers from mid-2018 for articles published in 2014 were investigated for articles with first authors from India, Spain, Turkey, the UK and the USA in up to 251 fields with at least 50 male and female authors. Although female-authored research is less cited in Turkey (−4.0%) and India (−3.6%), it is marginally more cited in Spain (0.4%), the UK (0.4%), and the USA (0.2%). Female-authored research has fewer Mendeley readers in India (−1.1%) but more in Spain (1.4%), Turkey (1.1%), the UK (2.7%) and the USA (3.0%). Thus, whilst there may be little practical gender difference in citation impact in countries with mature science systems, the higher female readership impact suggests a wider audience for female-authored research. The results also show that the conclusions from a gender analysis depend on the field normalisation method. A theoretically informed decision must therefore be made about which normalisation to use. The results also suggest that arithmetic mean-based field normalisation is favourable to males.
Citation
Thelwall, M. (2018), Do females create higher impact research? Scopus citations and Mendeley readers for articles from five countries, Journal of Informettics, 12(4) November 2018, Pages 1031-1041
Publisher
Research Unit
PubMed ID
PubMed Central ID
Embedded videos
Type
Journal article
Language
en
Description
Series/Report no.
ISSN
1751-1577
EISSN
ISBN
ISMN
Gov't Doc #
Sponsors
Rights
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Embedded videos