Loading...
Data in brief: Can a mega-journal for data be useful?
Thelwall, Michael
Thelwall, Michael
Authors
Editors
Other contributors
Affiliation
Epub Date
Issue Date
2020-04-07
Submitted date
Alternative
Abstract
As part of the current move towards open science, there is increasing pressure for scientists to share their research data. In support of this, several journals only publish descriptions of data generated from research: data papers. It is not clear whether this service encourages data reuse, however. This article assesses the prevalence and impact of the largest such journal, Data in Brief, comparing it with 24 other general or specialist data journals. The results show that Data in Brief became the largest data journal in 2016 and that its papers attracted over five Mendeley readers each, within a year of publication, as well as a non-trivial amount of citations. Its papers have been cited for relevance or facts contained in them in addition to acknowledging the reuse of associated datasets in about 1% of cases. Some papers describe electronic dataset whereas other papers embedded the tables or images that formed the shared data. Overall, the journal seems to make a positive contribution to science by enabling access to multiple types of data, even though its papers rarely lead to data reuse.
Citation
Thelwall, M. (2020) Data in brief: Can a mega-journal for data be useful? Scientometrics 124, pp. 697–709. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-020-03437-1
Publisher
Journal
Research Unit
PubMed ID
PubMed Central ID
Embedded videos
Additional Links
Type
Journal article
Language
en
Description
This is an accepted manuscript of an article published by Springer in Scientometrics on 07/04/2020.
The accepted version of the publication may differ from the final published version. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03437-1
Series/Report no.
ISSN
0138-9130