Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Item

Frameworks for standard cases of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) in the construction industry

Alternative
Abstract
Uncertainty in the homologation of drone legislation for nations has resulted from the argument over whether to control developing technology. In the field of Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) there is a lack of clarity in stablishing the policies. The intricacies involved in assessing risk probabilities, such as weight, altitude, commercial purpose, involvement of personnel, and other relevant variables, prompt countries to establish legislative frameworks for their Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) policies. This is driven by the recognition that homogeneity in certain application forms of UAS is achieved or discovered at varying rates. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive ontologies behind of regulating UAS by utilising standard cases of operations or ideal scenarios of application in which practices outside of these frames should be ethically evaluated for regulation in the field of construction. A longitudinal study was used to observe the policy changes, evolution of the technology, applications, and trends. In addition, 28 interviews and 30 surveys were conducted involving policy makers, practitioners, service providers, and academics in the Dominican Republic to identify their position in the adequate process of adopting UAS. The findings present that the implications in policy involve Building Information Modelling, safety aviation, technical inspection manuals, and design of cities by ruling the types and capabilities of UAS adopted for construction companies.
Citation
Reyonoso Vanderhorst, H., Suresh, S., Renukappa, S. and Heesom, D. (2023) Frameworks for standard cases of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) in the construction industry. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-969
Research Unit
PubMed ID
PubMed Central ID
Embedded videos
Type
Journal article
Language
en
Description
This is an accepted manuscript of an article published by the American Society of Civil Engineers in the Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction on 28/10/2023. This material may be downloaded for personal use only. Any other use requires prior permission of the American Society of Civil Engineers. This material may be found at: https://doi.org/10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-969
Series/Report no.
ISSN
1943-4162
EISSN
ISBN
ISMN
Gov't Doc #
Sponsors
Rights
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Embedded videos