Loading...
Can Microsoft Academic be used for citation analysis of preprint archives? The case of the Social Science Research Network
Thelwall, Mike
Thelwall, Mike
Authors
Editors
Other contributors
Affiliation
Epub Date
Issue Date
2018-03-07
Submitted date
Files
Alternative
Abstract
Preprint archives play an important scholarly communication role within some fields. The impact of archives and individual preprints are difficult to analyse because online repositories are not indexed by the Web of Science or Scopus. In response, this article assesses whether the new Microsoft Academic can be used for citation analysis of preprint archives, focusing on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN). Although Microsoft Academic seems to index SSRN comprehensively, it groups a small fraction of SSRN papers into an easily retrievable set that has variations in character over time, making any field normalisation or citation comparisons untrustworthy. A brief parallel analysis of arXiv suggests that similar results would occur for other online repositories. Systematic analyses of preprint archives are nevertheless possible with Microsoft Academic when complete lists of archive publications are available from other sources because of its promising coverage and citation results.
Citation
Thelwall, M. (2018) Can Microsoft Academic be used for citation analysis of preprint archives? The case of the Social Science Research Network. Scientometrics 115 (2), pp 913–928.
Publisher
Journal
Research Unit
PubMed ID
PubMed Central ID
Embedded videos
Additional Links
Type
Journal article
Language
en
Description
This is an accepted manuscript of an article published by Springer in Scientometrics on 07/03/2018, available online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2704-z
The accepted version of the publication may differ from the final published version.
Series/Report no.
ISSN
0138-9130