Loading...
The email conservation task: testing the validity of an online measure of direct pro-environmental behavior
Farrelly, Daniel Badham, Lee
Farrelly, Daniel
Badham, Lee
Editors
Other contributors
Affiliation
Epub Date
Issue Date
2024-09-25
Submitted date
Alternative
Abstract
There is a need for valid measures of pro-environmental behavior, in particular ones measuring actual behavior. In response, a number of such measures have been introduced recently, however each faces limitations such as high costs, practical use and/or only measure indirect environmental behavior, limiting their scope, accessibility and inclusivity. In response, this study introduces the easily administered and low-cost Email Conservation Task (ECT), which measures direct pro-environmental behaviour (in this case, email use). Here, participants chose between personal costs (time spent on trivial tasks) or environmental costs (receiving unnecessary emails leading to CO2 emissions) across multiple trials. In a pre-registered study testing the validity of the ECT, it was found (as hypothesized) that participants scored higher on the ECT (incurred more personal costs rather than receiving unnecessary emails) when personal costs to them were lower, and scored higher when the environmental costs of receiving unnecessary emails were higher. Finally, total scores on the ECT significantly correlated with scores on three self-reported indicators of pro-environmentalism. Overall, the results of this study support all three hypotheses, indicating that the ECT is a valid measure of pro-environmental behavior that can be implemented across a diverse range of research areas
Citation
Farrelly, D., Bhogal, M.S. and Badham, L. (2024) The email conservation task: testing the validity of an online measure of direct pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 99, Article number 102442
Publisher
Research Unit
PubMed ID
PubMed Central ID
Embedded videos
Additional Links
Type
Journal article
Language
en
Description
© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier. This is an open access article available under a Creative Commons licence. The published version can be accessed at the following link on the publisher’s website: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102442
Series/Report no.
ISSN
0272-4944