Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Item

Remote consultation in psychiatry: Preference of patients and clinicians following the COVID-19 experience

Cheung, Lai-Ting
Jiwanmall, Stephen Amarjeet
Alternative
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Following the COVID-19 pandemic, most mental health services have reverted to usual face-to-face consultations. We intended to explore the perception of patients and clinicians on remote consultations and their preferences for the future. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was an anonymous survey involving both patients and mental healthcare professionals (MHP). The quality and satisfaction of remote consultations, options for patients, and the use of remote consultations in the future were enquired about. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 107 MHP and 78 patients. A considerable proportion of MHP (56.1%) and patients (71.8%) felt satisfied with remote consultations (P < 0.05), and their quality was considered somewhat (11.2% vs. 23.1%) or a lot better (8.4% vs. 15.4%), respectively (P < 0.05). Most (61.1%) participants preferred a mixture of face-to-face and remote, in contrast to face-to-face (30.3%) or remote (8.6%); there were no differences between MHP and patients. The majority (82.7%) felt that an option should be given to patients to choose the method of consultation. Most doctors (71.4%), other clinicians (70.8%), and clinical managers (75.0%) opted for mixed methods, versus 26.9% of nurses (P < .005). Age group, ethnicity, experience of remote consultation with a general practitioner or hospital, attendance or admission to general or psychiatric hospitals during the pandemic, disabilities, having COVID-19, or psychiatric subspecialty were not associated with preference for the future consultation method. CONCLUSION: Both MHP and patients preferred a mixture of face-to-face and remote consultations in the future, and patients should have an option for choosing the consultation method.
Citation
Kar N, Cheung LT, Jiwanmall SA. Remote consultation in psychiatry: Preference of patients and clinicians following the COVID‑19 experience. Odisha Journal of Psychiatry 2025;21, pp. 117-22.
Research Unit
PubMed ID
PubMed Central ID
Embedded videos
Type
Journal article
Language
en
Description
© 2025 The Authors, published by Wolters Kluwer-Medknow. This is an open access article available under a Creative Commons licence. The published version can be accessed at the following link on the publisher’s website: https://journals.lww.com/odjp/fulltext/2025/07000/remote_consultation_in_psychiatry__preference_of.15.aspx
Series/Report no.
ISSN
2950-5992
EISSN
ISBN
ISMN
Gov't Doc #
Sponsors
Rights
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Embedded videos