Loading...
Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories
Martín-Martín, Alberto Orduna-Malea, Enrique Thelwall, Mike Delgado López-Cózar, Emilio
Martín-Martín, Alberto
Orduna-Malea, Enrique
Thelwall, Mike
Delgado López-Cózar, Emilio
Editors
Other contributors
Affiliation
Epub Date
Issue Date
2018-10-05
Submitted date
Subjects
Alternative
Abstract
Despite citation counts from Google Scholar (GS), Web of Science (WoS), and Scopus being widely consulted by researchers and sometimes used in research evaluations, there is no recent or systematic evidence about the differences between them. In response, this paper investigates 2,448,055 citations to 2299 English-language highly-cited documents from 252 GS subject categories published in 2006, comparing GS, the WoS Core Collection, and Scopus. GS consistently found the largest percentage of citations across all areas (93%–96%), far ahead of Scopus (35%–77%) and WoS (27%–73%). GS found nearly all the WoS (95%) and Scopus (92%) citations. Most citations found only by GS were from non-journal sources (48%–65%), including theses, books, conference papers, and unpublished materials. Many were non-English (19%–38%), and they tended to be much less cited than citing sources that were also in Scopus or WoS. Despite the many unique GS citing sources, Spearman correlations between citation counts in GS and WoS or Scopus are high (0.78-0.99). They are lower in the Humanities, and lower between GS and WoS than between GS and Scopus. The results suggest that in all areas GS citation data is essentially a superset of WoS and Scopus, with substantial extra coverage.
Citation
Martín-Martín, A., Orduña-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & López-Cózar, E.D. (2018). Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informetrics, 12 (4), pp 1160-1177.
Publisher
Journal
Research Unit
PubMed ID
PubMed Central ID
Embedded videos
Additional Links
Type
Journal article
Language
en
Description
This is an accepted manuscript of an article published by Elsevier in Journal of Informetrics on 05/10/2018, available online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002
The accepted version of the publication may differ from the final published version.
Series/Report no.
ISSN
1751-1577