Loading...
Resting after learning or repeating the learned?
Martini, Markus ; ; Luis, Gutmann ; Dahm, Stephan Frederic ; Marhenke, Robert ; Sachse, Pierre
Martini, Markus
Luis, Gutmann
Dahm, Stephan Frederic
Marhenke, Robert
Sachse, Pierre
Editors
Other contributors
Affiliation
Epub Date
Issue Date
2026-12-31
Submitted date
Alternative
Abstract
The formation of new memories can be influenced by the activities that immediately follow learning. Previous research has shown that several minutes of wakeful resting after learning can enhance memory retention compared to engaging in unrelated tasks, likely by facilitating memory consolidation. However, the relative efficacy of wakeful resting compared to other potentially memory-enhancing post-learning activities, like post-learning repetition, remains unclear. We conducted two experiments examining the effects of wakeful resting and repetition on memory retention. Participants studied three auditorily presented word lists. Each word list was immediately followed by one of three 7 minute post-learning interventions: (1) repetitive listening to the word list, (2) wakeful resting, or (3) engaging in a new task. Across both experiments, memory performance was highest in the repetition condition, followed by the wakeful resting condition, with the lowest performance observed in the distraction condition. These findings were observed 12 minutes after acquisition and remained stable after 1 day. Our results highlight the differential effects of post-learning activities on memory retention. Wakeful resting is an effective and easy-to-implement strategy for facilitating memory consolidation, but in direct comparison, repetition appears to be even more effective for optimising memory retention.
Citation
Publisher
Journal
Research Unit
DOI
PubMed ID
PubMed Central ID
Embedded videos
Additional Links
Type
Journal article
Language
en
Description
This is an author's accepted manuscript of an article published by Springer Nature in Psychonomic Bulletin and Review on [date tbc]. This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/[insert DOI]
Series/Report no.
ISSN
1069-9384
EISSN
1531-5320