Relationship between adiposity and body size reveals limitations of BMI.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractThe aims of this study were to assess 1) whether the stature-adjusted body mass index (BMI) is a valid proxy for adiposity across both athletic and nonathletic populations, and 2) whether skinfold measurements increase in proportion to body size, thus obeying the principle of geometric similarity. The research design was cross-sectional, allowing the relationship between skinfold calliper readings (at eight sites and between specific athletic and nonathletic groups, n = 478) and body size (either mass, stature, or both) to be explored both collectively, using proportional allometric MANCOVA, and individually (for each site) with follow-up ANCOVAs. Skinfolds increase at a much greater rate relative to body mass than that assumed by geometric similarity, but taller subjects had less rather than more adiposity, calling into question the use of the traditional skinfold-stature adjustment, 170.18/stature. The best body-size index reflective of skinfold measurements was a stature-adjusted body mass index similar to the BMI. However, sporting differences in skinfold thickness persisted, having controlled for differences in body size (approximate BMI) and age, with male strength- and speed-trained athletes having significantly lower skinfolds (32% and 23%, respectively) compared with controls. Similarly, female strength athletes had 29% lower skinfold measurements compared to controls, having controlled for body size and age. These results cast serious doubts on the validity of BMI to represent adiposity accurately and its ability to differentiate between populations. These findings suggest a more valid (less biased) assessment of fatness will be obtained using surface anthropometry such as skinfolds taken by experienced practitioners following established procedures.
CitationAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 129(1): 151-156
JournalAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology
- Adiposity, physical activity, and physical fitness among children from Aragón, Spain.
- Authors: Ara I, Moreno LA, Leiva MT, Gutin B, Casajús JA
- Issue date: 2007 Aug
- The prediction of body fatness by BMI and skinfold thicknesses among children and adolescents.
- Authors: Freedman DS, Wang J, Ogden CL, Thornton JC, Mei Z, Pierson RN, Dietz WH, Horlick M
- Issue date: 2007 Mar-Apr
- Adjusting athletes' body mass index to better reflect adiposity in epidemiological research.
- Authors: Nevill AM, Winter EM, Ingham S, Watts A, Metsios GS, Stewart AD
- Issue date: 2010 Jul
- Body frame dimensions are related to obesity and fatness: Lean trunk size, skinfolds, and body mass index.
- Authors: Henneberg M, Ulijaszek SJ
- Issue date: 2010 Jan-Feb
- Comparison of techniques to evaluate adiposity in stunted and nonstunted children.
- Authors: Hoffman DJ, Sawaya AL, Martins PA, McCrory MA, Roberts SB
- Issue date: 2006 Apr