Optimal power-to-mass ratios when predicting flat and hill-climbing time-trial cycling.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractThe purpose of this article was to establish whether previously reported oxygen-to-mass ratios, used to predict flat and hill-climbing cycling performance, extend to similar power-to-mass ratios incorporating other, often quick and convenient measures of power output recorded in the laboratory [maximum aerobic power (W(MAP)), power output at ventilatory threshold (W(VT)) and average power output (W(AVG)) maintained during a 1 h performance test]. A proportional allometric model was used to predict the optimal power-to-mass ratios associated with cycling speeds during flat and hill-climbing cycling. The optimal models predicting flat time-trial cycling speeds were found to be (W(MAP)m(-0.48))(0.54), (W(VT)m(-0.48))(0.46) and (W(AVG)m(-0.34))(0.58) that explained 69.3, 59.1 and 96.3% of the variance in cycling speeds, respectively. Cross-validation results suggest that, in conjunction with body mass, W(MAP) can provide an accurate and independent prediction of time-trial cycling, explaining 94.6% of the variance in cycling speeds with the standard deviation about the regression line, s=0.686 km h(-1). Based on these models, there is evidence to support that previously reported VO2-to-mass ratios associated with flat cycling speed extend to other laboratory-recorded measures of power output (i.e. Wm(-0.32)). However, the power-function exponents (0.54, 0.46 and 0.58) would appear to conflict with the assumption that the cyclists' speeds should be proportional to the cube root (0.33) of power demand/expended, a finding that could be explained by other confounding variables such as bicycle geometry, tractional resistance and/or the presence of a tailwind. The models predicting 6 and 12% hill-climbing cycling speeds were found to be proportional to (W(MAP)m(-0.91))(0.66), revealing a mass exponent, 0.91, that also supports previous research.
CitationEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology, 97(4): 424-431
PublisherSpringer Berlin / Heidelberg
JournalEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology
- Allometric scaling of uphill cycling performance.
- Authors: Jobson SA, Woodside J, Passfield L, Nevill AM
- Issue date: 2008 Sep
- Effect of cycling position on oxygen uptake and preferred cadence in trained cyclists during hill climbing at various power outputs.
- Authors: Harnish C, King D, Swensen T
- Issue date: 2007 Mar
- Influence of hydration status on thermoregulation and cycling hill climbing.
- Authors: Ebert TR, Martin DT, Bullock N, Mujika I, Quod MJ, Farthing LA, Burke LM, Withers RT
- Issue date: 2007 Feb
- Scaling maximal oxygen uptake to predict cycling time-trial performance in the field: a non-linear approach.
- Authors: Nevill AM, Jobson SA, Palmer GS, Olds TS
- Issue date: 2005 Aug
- Mild dehydration and cycling performance during 5-kilometer hill climbing.
- Authors: Bardis CN, Kavouras SA, Arnaoutis G, Panagiotakos DB, Sidossis LS
- Issue date: 2013 Nov-Dec