• Admin Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Faculty of Science and Engineering
    • Faculty of Science and Engineering
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Faculty of Science and Engineering
    • Faculty of Science and Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of WIRECommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsTypesJournalDepartmentPublisherThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsTypesJournalDepartmentPublisher

    Administrators

    Admin Login

    Local Links

    AboutThe University LibraryOpen Access Publications PolicyDeposit LicenceCOREWIRE Copyright and Reuse Information

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    An evaluation of the introduction of modified cropping practices in Yunnan Province, China, using surveys of farmers' households

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Publisher version
    View Source
    Access full-text PDFOpen Access
    View Source
    Check access options
    Check access options
    Authors
    Subedi, Madhu
    Hocking, Trevor J.
    Fullen, Michael A.
    McCrea, Alison R.
    Milne, E.
    Mitchell, David J.
    Wu, Bozhi
    Issue Date
    2009
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Problems associated with land degradation are serious in China. Sloping land in South China has experienced a decline in crop productivity by 30-60% due to soil erosion and it has been predicted that most topsoil will be lost within the next 100 years if current erosion rates continue. Considering these situations, an agro-environmental research and development project (Sustainable Highland Agriculture in South-East Asia – SHASEA) was conducted in a catchment in Yunnan Province, China, to address the objectives of increasing crop productivity in sustainable and environmentally-friendly ways. A range of cropping practices was developed and implemented in a rural upland catchment (Wang Jia). At the end of the project, farmers were surveyed to evaluate project effectiveness. All farmers from Wang Jia Catchment, who were involved in project implementation, were surveyed. A sample of farmers working in an adjacent catchment (not associated with the project) was surveyed for comparative purposes. Farmers had different perceptions of the cropping practices employed. Contour cultivation was preferred and likely to be adopted. Others practices such as straw mulching and intercropping were seen as less appropriate and unlikely to be adopted. Polythene mulch was recognized as effective, but likely to be adopted only if financial returns were favourable. The availability of relevant information had an important impact on the extent of technology testing by farmers and their willingness to adopt the practices in the future.
    Citation
    Agricultural Sciences in China, 8(2): 188-202
    Publisher
    Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V.
    Journal
    Agricultural Sciences in China
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/2436/66081
    DOI
    10.1016/S1671-2927(09)60027-4
    Additional Links
    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B82XG-4VP7XPF-B&_user=1644469&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000054077&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=1644469&md5=baf8cdab22ce5b522cfc194aa848bade
    Type
    Journal article
    Language
    en
    ISSN
    16712927
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1016/S1671-2927(09)60027-4
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Faculty of Science and Engineering

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.