Abstract
Purpose: The extant literature on work–life balance (WLB) has generally overlooked the interrelationship between leadership and WLB. Does leadership have any impact on employees' use of WLB policies and practices? To answer this question, this article considers the social exchange theory as well as transformational and transactional leadership in an investigation of the impact of leadership on WLB. Design/methodology/approach: The study employs qualitative data from 32 semi-structured interviews to achieve the study’s objectives. Findings: The research reveals that leadership does matter in WLB. The study findings reveal that both the transactional and transformational leadership styles result in the establishment of strong reciprocal relationships between leaders and employees in terms of using WLB policies and practices. Managers only sanction the use of WLB policies and practices only as a reward for excellent performance or when they are completely sure the outcome will favour the organisation. The study concludes that the desire to achieve WLB has often led many employees to go the extra mile in carrying out their work duties, which is rewarded with an approval to use WLB policies and practices. These non-contractual exchanges emphasise reciprocity and are based on trust. Research limitations/implications: The extent to which the findings of this research can be generalised is constrained by the size and nature of the research sample. Practical implications: Many managers are transactional leaders, and they purposefully allow their employees to use WLB policies and practices only as a reward for meeting targets and for excellent performance. This means that employees who fall short of the required targets and expected performance are not permitted to use WLB policies and practices. This finding implies that such employees experience incessant work–family conflict, which may have negative implications for their work engagement, overall well-being and work performance. Originality/value: This study demonstrates that leadership is relevant to WLB. It shows that transformational leadership is supportive of WLB, as it considers employees' work performance and non-work outcomes. The results and practical implications of this study aids the understanding of the non-contractual exchanges involved in manager–employee relationships, which is crucial for ensuring employees' achievement of WLB and for organisations to achieve their goals.Citation
Sani, K.F. and Adisa, T.A. (2024) Work–life balance: Does leadership matter? Employee Relations, 46(2), pp. 269-286. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-03-2023-0145Publisher
EmeraldJournal
Employee RelationsAdditional Links
https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-03-2023-0145Type
Journal articleLanguage
enDescription
This is an author's accepted manuscript of an article published by Emerald in Employee Relations on 10/01/2024, available online: https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-03-2023-0145 The accepted manuscript may differ form the final published version.ISSN
0142-5455ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1108/ER-03-2023-0145
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/