Moving sport and exercise science forward: A call for the adoption of more transparent research practices
AuthorsCaldwell, Aaron R.
Vigotsky, Andrew D.
Tenan, Matthew S.
Mellor, David T.
Mills, John P.
Boisgontier, Matthieu P.
Consortium for Transparency in Exercise Science (COTES) Collaborators
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractThe primary means of disseminating sport and exercise science research is currently through journal articles. However, not all studies, especially those with null findings, make it to formal publication. This publication bias towards positive findings may contribute to questionable research practices. Preregistration is a solution to prevent the publication of distorted evidence resulting from this system. This process asks authors to register their hypotheses and methods before data collection on a publicly available repository or by submitting a Registered Report. In the Registered Report format, authors submit a stage 1 manuscript to a participating journal that includes an introduction, methods, and any pilot data indicating the exploratory or confirmatory nature of the study. After a stage 1 peer review, the manuscript can then be offered in-principle acceptance, rejected, or sent back for revisions to improve the quality of the study. If accepted, the project is guaranteed publication, assuming the authors follow the data collection and analysis protocol. After data collection, authors re-submit a stage 2 manuscript that includes the results and discussion, and the study is evaluated on clarity and conformity with the planned analysis. In its final form, Registered Reports appear almost identical to a typical publication, but give readers confidence that the hypotheses and main analyses are less susceptible to bias from questionable research practices. From this perspective, we argue that inclusion of Registered Reports by researchers and journals will improve the transparency, replicability, and trust in sport and exercise science research. The preprint version of this work is available on SportRχiv: https://osf.io/preprints/sportrxiv/fxe7a/.
CitationCaldwell, A.R., Vigotsky, A.D., Tenan, M.S. et al. (2020) Moving sport and exercise science forward: A call for the adoption of more transparent research practices. Sports Medicine 50, pp. 449–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01227-1
PubMed ID32020542 (pubmed)
DescriptionThis is an accepted manuscript of an article published by Springer on 04/02/2020, available online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01227-1 The accepted version may differ from the final published version. For re-se please see the publisher's terms and conditions.
- Moving Sport and Exercise Science Forward: A Call for the Adoption of More Transparent Research Practices.
- Authors: Caldwell AR, Vigotsky AD, Tenan MS, Radel R, Mellor DT, Kreutzer A, Lahart IM, Mills JP, Boisgontier MP, Consortium for Transparency in Exercise Science (COTES) Collaborators
- Issue date: 2020 Mar
- Are questionable research practices facilitating new discoveries in sport and exercise medicine? The proportion of supported hypotheses is implausibly high.
- Authors: Büttner F, Toomey E, McClean S, Roe M, Delahunt E
- Issue date: 2020 Nov
- Evaluating implementation of the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guidelines: the TRUST process for rating journal policies, procedures, and practices.
- Authors: Mayo-Wilson E, Grant S, Supplee L, Kianersi S, Amin A, DeHaven A, Mellor D
- Issue date: 2021 Jun 2
- The bias for statistical significance in sport and exercise medicine.
- Authors: Borg DN, Barnett AG, Caldwell AR, White NM, Stewart IB
- Issue date: 2023 Mar