MetadataShow full item record
AbstractThe complexity of hazards, risk and environmental legislation surrounding the reuse of brownfield sites necessitates a preliminary risk assessment prior to their redevelopment. Most prevailing efforts have been targeted at indepth site investigations, which are often costly, time–consuming, and may not be required at the early stages of a site development. However, there is a collective absence of knowledge, methods and computer models that can present a complete framework to carry out a preliminary risk assessment that is simpler, quicker and sufficient, not only for risk assessor but also effectively communicative for a diverse range of stakeholders with or without risk assessment expertise. Therefore, this study aims to bridge this gap by designing and creating a framework, by not only identifying hazards but also exposing the degree of presence. Sixty-five potential hazards have been identified from a comprehensive literature review. A questionnaire survey was then shared with brownfield site experts (n = 76) that asked then to rank the priority of the potential hazards. Kendall's W test and Kruskal–Wallis H test were subsequently conducted to determine the level of agreement among the respondents. Mean weightings were calculated by using the Voting Analytic Hierarchy Process (VAHP) to prioritize the potential hazards from ‘more likely’ to ‘least likely’. Based on this information, the framework has been developed. It is anticipated that the framework can assist professionals to conduct a preliminary assessment of brownfield sites, which enables them to gain informative and rapid guidance on any potential liabilities or risks related to a site's suitability for acquisition or redevelopment. In this context, the framework outlines a systematic structure to collect appropriate data and information in the three main categories which are sources, pathways and receptors.
CitationMahammedi, C., Mahdjoubi, L., Booth, C.A. and Butt, T.E. (2021) Framework for preliminary risk assessment of brownfield sites. Science of The Total Environment. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151069
JournalScience of the Total Environment
PubMed ID34678367 (pubmed)
DescriptionThis is an accepted manuscript of an article published by Elsevier in Science of the Total Environment on 19/10/2021, available online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151069 The accepted version of the publication may differ from the final published version.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Framework for preliminary risk assessment of brownfield sites.
- Authors: Mahammedi C, Mahdjoubi L, Booth CA, Butt TE
- Issue date: 2022 Feb 10
- Criteria for Preliminary Risk Assessment of Brownfield Site: An International Survey of Experts.
- Authors: Mahammedi C, Mahdjoubi L, Booth C, Bowman R, Butt TE
- Issue date: 2022 Oct
- Reconsidering brownfield redevelopment strategy in China's old industrial zone: a health risk assessment of heavy metal contamination.
- Authors: Ren W, Geng Y, Ma Z, Sun L, Xue B, Fujita T
- Issue date: 2015 Feb
- Measuring site-level success in brownfield redevelopments: a focus on sustainability and green building.
- Authors: Wedding GC, Crawford-Brown D
- Issue date: 2007 Oct