Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMbzibain, Aurelian
dc.contributor.authorTchoudjen, Teodyl Nkuintchua
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-07T08:48:53Z
dc.date.available2021-09-07T08:48:53Z
dc.date.issued2021-08-28
dc.identifier.citationMbzibain, A. and Tchoudjen, T.N. (2021) NGO-state relations in the monitoring of illegal forest logging and wildlife trafficking in Central Africa. World Development, 148, 105670.en
dc.identifier.issn0305-750Xen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105670en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/624318
dc.descriptionThis is an accepted manuscript of an article published by Elsevier in World Development on 28/08/2021, available online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105670 The accepted version of the publication may differ from the final published version.en
dc.description.abstractIndependent forest monitoring (IFM) by Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) emerged in the late 1990s as a forest governance mechanism in response to rising forest crime in Asia and Central Africa. IFM is the use of an independent third party that, by agreement or not with state authorities, provides an assessment of legal compliance, and observation of and guidance on official forest law enforcement systems. The success of IFM by NGOs is therefore, inextricably linked to the nature of the relationship with state authorities yet this relationship has neither been explored nor understood. There is scant empirical research on this mechanism globally. This paper addresses these gaps through participatory observation, documentary analysis and interviews with leaders of five NGOs at the forefront of forest and wildlife monitoring in Central Africa. Using Najam (2000) 4-C framework, we find complex and fluid relationships ranging from cooperation, complementarity, confrontation and instrumentalization. Complementarity and confrontation emerge as the most important relationship types while cooperation is the least prevalent relationship. In response to challenges in the relationships, NGOs use a repertoire of strategies and tactics to influence the state in pursuit of their goals. Unfortunately, significant dependence on a limited stream of intermittent external donor funding and lack of clearly articulated influence and advocacy strategies, limit the potential contribution of IFM to the fight against forest and wildlife crime in Central Africa. The implications for IFM organisations, national governments and donor agencies are discussed.en
dc.formatapplication/pdfen
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305750X21002850?via%3Dihuben
dc.subjectindependent forest and wildlife monitoringen
dc.subjectNGOen
dc.subjectstateen
dc.subjectmixed methodsen
dc.subjectCentral Africaen
dc.titleNGO-state relations in the monitoring of illegal forest logging and wildlife trafficking in Central Africaen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.journalWorld Developmenten
dc.date.updated2021-09-03T20:59:28Z
dc.identifier.articlenumber105670
dc.date.accepted2021-08-15
rioxxterms.funderUniversity of Wolverhamptonen
rioxxterms.identifier.projectUOW07092021AMen
rioxxterms.versionAMen
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2023-08-28en
dc.source.volume148
dc.description.versionAccepted version
refterms.dateFCD2021-09-07T08:33:34Z
refterms.versionFCDAM


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version
Thumbnail
Name:
Mbzibain_NGO_state_relations_2 ...
Size:
1.537Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/