Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTraxler, John
dc.contributor.authorConnor, Stuart
dc.contributor.authorHayes, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorJandrić, Petar
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-28T10:58:00Z
dc.date.available2021-06-28T10:58:00Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-12
dc.identifier.citationTraxler, J., Connor, S., Hayes, S. & Jandric, P. (2021) Futures studies, mobilities, and the postdigital condition: Contention or complement, Postdigital Science and Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00245-5en
dc.identifier.issn2524-4868en
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s42438-021-00245-5
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/624155
dc.descriptionThis is an accepted manuscript of an article published by Springer Nature in Postdigital Science and Education, available online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00245-5 The accepted version of the publication may differ from the final published version.en
dc.description.abstractThis paper explores relationships between recent developments in the fields of mobilities, futures, and postdigital studies. The article covers six main themes: questions and their histories; definitions; research methods and ethics; the nature and ownership of knowing and learning; understandings of time, space, identity, community and relationships; political processes and political legitimacy. The article was written in three steps. In the first step, the leading author (John Traxler) has identified the relevant themes. In the second step, proponents of each position have freely responded to the themes (futures studies, Stuart Connor; postdigital theory, Sarah Hayes and Petar Jandrić; mobilities, John Traxler). In the third step, the responses have been collectively (re)mixed and edited, identifying complementary and conflicting concepts and ideas. The article was initiated a month before the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic, and it was completed just over a year later. Thusly, responses and analyses have included the pandemic experience without explicitly focusing to the Covid-19 pandemic. The paper concludes with drawing together contributions, seeking underlying commonalities and differences, and looking for trends, convergence, and change. Epistemically, the three positions discussed in this paper are far from commensurable. Yet they are compatible and complementary, in a postdigital dialogue, in a sense that they all need each others’ inputs on the road to a better understanding of our current condition, and the road to a better future.en
dc.formatapplication/pdfen
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSpringeren
dc.relation.urlhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42438-021-00245-5en
dc.subjectpostdigitalen
dc.subjectmobilitiesen
dc.subjectFuturesen
dc.subjectethicsen
dc.subjectknowingen
dc.subjectworldviewsen
dc.subjectparadigmsen
dc.subjectnew normalen
dc.subjectphilosophiesen
dc.titleFutures studies, mobilities, and the postdigital condition: Contention or complementen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.journalPostdigital Science and Educationen
dc.date.updated2021-06-28T10:00:44Z
dc.date.accepted2021-06-26
rioxxterms.funderuniversity of wolverhamptonen
rioxxterms.identifier.projectUOW28062021JTen
rioxxterms.versionAMen
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-07-12en
refterms.dateFCD2021-06-28T10:55:47Z
refterms.versionFCDAM


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Traxler_Future_Studies_Mobilit ...
Embargo:
2022-07-12
Size:
622.1Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/