Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOke, A
dc.contributor.authorOsobajo, O
dc.contributor.authorObi, L
dc.contributor.authorOmotayo, T
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-27T10:19:17Z
dc.date.available2020-10-27T10:19:17Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-23
dc.identifier.citationOke, A., Osobajo, O., Obi, L. and Omotayo, T. (2020) Rethinking and optimising post-consumer packaging waste: A sentiment analysis of consumers’ perceptions towards the introduction of a deposit refund scheme in Scotland, Waste Management, 118, pp. 463-470.en
dc.identifier.issn0956-053Xen
dc.identifier.pmid32977306 (pubmed)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.wasman.2020.09.008en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/623739
dc.descriptionThis is an accepted manuscript of an article published by Elsevier in Waste Management on 23/09/2020, available online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.09.008 The accepted version of the publication may differ from the final published version.en
dc.description.abstract© 2020 Elsevier Ltd Packaging waste production, especially single-use containers, is exerting detrimental effects on terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, including human health. To internalise the externalities associated with single-use containers, different instruments, including a deposit refund scheme (DRS), have been operationalised in many countries. Therefore, DRS is introduced in Scotland to reduce plastic litters by increasing recycling rates and incentivising pro-environmental behavioural change. This study addresses the complexity of single-use plastic containers by analysing consumers’ perceptions regarding the introduction of DRS in Scotland. Using 940 comments from the BBC “Have Your Say” messageboard, this study adopts sentiment analysis to understand consumers’ opinions about the introduction and implementation of DRS in Scotland. Findings suggest that a UK-wide scheme that is similar in terms of operations and structure is required for DRS to be successful. While consumers’ knowledge and opinions about DRS are mixed, the efficacy of DRS including its relevance is questioned and raises doubts about its contribution to sustainability. The findings imply the need for UK countries to negotiate and collaborate on appropriate and attractive interventions in addressing post-consumer single-use plastic containers. The implications of the findings for policy and practice, especially in improving the operations of DRS are further discussed.en
dc.formatapplication/pdfen
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X20305183?via%3Dihuben
dc.subjectdeposit refund schemeen
dc.subjectplastic wasteen
dc.subjectsentiment analysisen
dc.subjectsustainabilityen
dc.subject.meshConsumer Behavior
dc.subject.meshEcosystem
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshPlastics
dc.subject.meshProduct Packaging
dc.subject.meshRecycling
dc.subject.meshScotland
dc.titleRethinking and optimising post-consumer packaging waste: A sentiment analysis of consumers’ perceptions towards the introduction of a deposit refund scheme in Scotlanden
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.eissn1879-2456
dc.identifier.journalWaste Managementen
dc.date.updated2020-10-21T18:56:06Z
dc.contributor.institutionAberdeen Business School, Robert Gordon University, Garthdee Road, Aberdeen AB10 7QE, UK. Electronic address: a.oke1@rgu.ac.uk.
pubs.place-of-publicationUnited States
dc.date.accepted2020-09-07
rioxxterms.funderUniversity of Wolverhamptonen
rioxxterms.identifier.projectUOW27102020LOen
rioxxterms.versionAMen
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-09-23en
dc.source.volume118
dc.source.beginpage463
dc.source.endpage470
dc.description.versionAccepted version
refterms.dateFCD2020-10-27T10:08:33Z
refterms.versionFCDP


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version
Thumbnail
Name:
Oke_et_al_Rethinking_and_optim ...
Size:
1.770Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/