Power, precision, and sample size estimation in sport and exercise science research
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractThe majority of papers submitted to the Journal of Sports Sciences are experimental. The data are collected from a sample of the population and then used to test hypotheses and/or make inferences about that population. A common question in experimental research is therefore “how large should my sample be?”. Broadly, there are two approaches to estimating sample size – using power and using precision. If a study uses frequentist hypothesis testing, it is common to conduct a power calculation to determine how many participants would be required to reject the null hypothesis assuming an effect of a given size is present. That is, if there’s an effect of the treatment (of given size x), a power calculation will determine approximately how many participants would be required to detect that effect (of size x or larger) a given percentage of the time (often 80%). Power calculations as conducted in popular software programmes such as G*Power (Faul et al., 2009) typically require inputs for the estimated effect size, alpha, power (1 – ᵦ), and the statistical tests to be conducted. All of these inputs are subjective (or informed by previous studies) and up to the researcher to decide the most appropriate balance between type 1 error rate (false positive), type 2 error rate (false negative), cost, and time. In contrast, estimating sample size via precision involves estimating how many participants would be required for the frequentist confidence interval or Bayesian credible interval resulting from a statistical analysis to be of a certain width. The implication is that a narrower confidence interval or credible interval allows a more precise estimation of where the “true” population parameter (e.g., mean difference) might be.
CitationAbt, G., Boreham, C., Davison, G., Jackson, R. et al. (2020) Power, precision, and sample size estimation in sport and exercise science research, Journal of Sports Sciences. DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1776002
PublisherInforma UK Limited
JournalJournal of Sports Sciences
PubMed ID32558628 (pubmed)
DescriptionThis is an accepted manuscript of an article published by Taylor and Francis in Journal of Sports Sciences on 19/06/2020, available online: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2020.1776002 The accepted version of the publication may differ from the final published version.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Power, precision, and sample size estimation in sport and exercise science research.
- Authors: Abt G, Boreham C, Davison G, Jackson R, Nevill A, Wallace E, Williams M
- Issue date: 2020 Sep
- Estimation versus falsification approaches in sport and exercise science.
- Authors: Wilkinson M, Winter EM
- Issue date: 2019 Jan
- Statistical Primer for Athletic Trainers: Understanding the Role of Statistical Power in Comparative Athletic Training Research.
- Authors: Lininger MR, Riemann BL
- Issue date: 2018 Jul
- Does size matter for sports performance researchers?
- Authors: Atkinson G
- Issue date: 2003 Feb