Validity of a noninvasive estimation of deep body temperature when wearing personal protective equipment during exercise and recovery
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
MetadataShow full item record
Abstract© 2019 The Author(s). Background: Deep body temperature is a critical indicator of heat strain. However, direct measures are often invasive, costly, and difficult to implement in the field. This study assessed the agreement between deep body temperature estimated from heart rate and that measured directly during repeated work bouts while wearing explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) protective clothing and during recovery. Methods: Eight males completed three work and recovery periods across two separate days. Work consisted of treadmill walking on a 1% incline at 2.5, 4.0, or 5.5 km/h, in a random order, wearing EOD protective clothing. Ambient temperature and relative humidity were maintained at 24 °C and 50% [Wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) (20.9 ± 1.2) °C] or 32 °C and 60% [WBGT (29.0 ± 0.2) °C] on the separate days, respectively. Heart rate and gastrointestinal temperature (TGI) were monitored continuously, and deep body temperature was also estimated from heart rate (ECTemp). Results: The overall systematic bias between TGI and ECTemp was 0.01 °C with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) of ±0.64 °C and a root mean square error of 0.32 °C. The average error statistics among participants showed no significant differences in error between the exercise and recovery periods or the environmental conditions. At TGI levels of (37.0-37.5) °C, (37.5-38.0) °C, (38.0-38.5) °C, and > 38.5 °C, the systematic bias and ± 95% LoA were (0.08 ± 0.58) °C, (-0.02 ± 0.69) °C, (-0.07 ± 0.63) °C, and (-0.32 ± 0.56) °C, respectively. Conclusions: The findings demonstrate acceptable validity of the ECTemp up to 38.5 °C. Conducting work within an ECTemp limit of 38.4 °C, in conditions similar to the present study, would protect the majority of personnel from an excessive elevation in deep body temperature (> 39.0 °C).
CitationHunt, A.P., Buller, M.J., Maley, M.J. et al. (2019) Validity of a noninvasive estimation of deep body temperature when wearing personal protective equipment during exercise and recovery. Military Medical Research, 6(20). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-019-0208-7
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
JournalMilitary Medical Research
Description©2019 The Authors. Published by BMC. This is an open access article available under a Creative Commons licence. The published version can be accessed at the following link on the publisher’s website: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-019-0208-7
SponsorsThis project was financially supported by the Australian Government, managed by the National Security Science & Technology Centre within the Defence Science & Technology Organisation, and the US Government through the Technical Support Working Group within the Combating Terrorism Technical Support Office.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Licence for published version: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
- Can perceptual indices estimate physiological strain across a range of environments and metabolic workloads when wearing explosive ordnance disposal and chemical protective clothing?
- Authors: Borg DN, Stewart IB, Costello JT
- Issue date: 2015 Aug 1
- Physiological tolerance times while wearing explosive ordnance disposal protective clothing in simulated environmental extremes.
- Authors: Stewart IB, Stewart KL, Worringham CJ, Costello JT
- Issue date: 2014
- Inside the 'Hurt Locker': The Combined Effects of Explosive Ordnance Disposal and Chemical Protective Clothing on Physiological Tolerance Time in Extreme Environments.
- Authors: Costello JT, Stewart KL, Stewart IB
- Issue date: 2015 Aug
- Heat stress assessment during intermittent work under different environmental conditions and clothing combinations of effective wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT).
- Authors: Seo Y, Powell J, Strauch A, Roberge R, Kenny GP, Kim JH
- Issue date: 2019 Jul
- Heat Strain Decision Aid (HSDA) accurately predicts individual-based core body temperature rise while wearing chemical protective clothing.
- Authors: Potter AW, Hunt AP, Cadarette BS, Fogarty A, Srinivasan S, Santee WR, Blanchard LA, Looney DP
- Issue date: 2019 Apr