The impact of maternal pre-pregnancy impaired fasting glucose on preterm birth and large for gestational age: a large population-based cohort study
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Issue Date
2019-09-28
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background The impact of maternal pre-pregnancy impaired fasting glucose on preterm birth and large for gestational age has been poorly understood. Objectives We aimed to estimate the impact of pre-pregnancy impaired fasting glucose defined by the WHO cut-point on the risk of preterm birth and large for gestational age, and to investigate whether the WHO cut-point of impaired fasting glucose was appropriate for identifying women at the risk of preterm birth and large for gestational age among the Chinese population. Study Design This was a retrospective cohort study of women from the National Free Preconception Health Examination Project with singleton birth from 121 counties/districts in 21 cities of Guangdong Province, China, from 1st January 2013 to 31st December 2017. Women were included if pre-pregnancy fasting glucose was less than 7.0mmol/L. The primary outcomes were preterm birth (gestational age <37 weeks), early preterm birth (gestational age <34 weeks), large for gestational age (birth weight by gestational age >90th percentile based on the international standards in the INTERGROWTH-21st) and severe large for gestational age (birth weight by gestational age >97th percentile). We calculated the adjusted risk ratio for impaired fasting glucose, and a 1 standard deviation increase in fasting glucose. Results We included 640469 women. Of these, 31006 (4.84%) met the WHO cut-point for impaired fasting glucose, 32640 (5.10%) had preterm birth and 7201 (1.12%) had early preterm birth, 45532 (7.11%) had large for gestational age birth and 16231 (2.53%) had severe large for gestational age birth. Compared with women with normoglycaemia, women with pre-pregnancy impaired fasting glucose had a 7.0% higher risk of preterm birth (adjusted risk ratio 1.07, 95%CI 1.02-1.12), 10.0% higher risk of large for gestational age (1.10, 1.06-1.14) and 17.0% higher risk of severe large for gestational age (1.17, 1.10-1.26). No significant association of pre-pregnancy impaired fasting glucose with early preterm birth was found. The association of pre-pregnancy impaired fasting glucose with preterm birth and large for gestational age were similar in subgroups of women with various baseline characteristics. Adjusted risk ratio for preterm birth per standard deviation fasting glucose (0.7mmol/L) was 0.99 (95% CI 0.98-1.00), for early preterm birth 0.99 (0.97-1.02), for large for gestational age 1.04 (1.03-1.05) and for severe large for gestational age 1.03 (1.01-1.04). Conclusions Our data suggest that maternal pre-pregnancy impaired fasting glucose increases the risk of preterm birth, large for gestational age and severe large for gestational age. Data also suggest that the WHO cut-point of impaired fasting glucose is too restrictive and lesser levels of fasting glucose also increase the risk of large gestational age and severe for severe gestational age in the Chinese population. Further investigation is warranted to determine whether and how counselling and interventions for women with pre-pregnancy impaired fasting glucose could reduce the risk of preterm birth and large for gestational age.Citation
Tang, J. J., Zhu, X., Li, M., Huang, D. and Zhao, Q. (2020) The impact of maternal pre-pregnancy impaired fasting glucose on preterm birth and large for gestational age: a large population-based cohort study, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 222(3), pp. 265.e1-265.e19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.09.037Publisher
ElsevierJournal
American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyType
Journal articleLanguage
enISSN
0002-9378Sponsors
This work was supported by grants National Natural Science Foundation of China (81773457 & 81302445 to JJT)ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.ajog.2019.09.037
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/