Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFarre, A
dc.contributor.authorBem, D
dc.contributor.authorHeath, G
dc.contributor.authorShaw, K
dc.contributor.authorCummins, C
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-03T15:34:41Z
dc.date.available2019-12-03T15:34:41Z
dc.date.issued2016-07-08
dc.identifier.citationFarre A, Bem D, Heath G, et al. (2016) Perceptions and experiences of the implementation, management, use and optimisation of electronic prescribing systems in hospital settings: protocol for a systematic review of qualitative studies, BMJ Open, 6:, p. e011858. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011858en
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055en
dc.identifier.pmid27401366
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011858en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/622954
dc.description.abstract© 2016 Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use. Introduction: There is increasing evidence that electronic prescribing (ePrescribing) or computerised provider/physician order entry (CPOE) systems can improve the quality and safety of healthcare services. However, it has also become clear that their implementation is not straightforward and may create unintended or undesired consequences once in use. In this context, qualitative approaches have been particularly useful and their interpretative synthesis could make an important and timely contribution to the field. This review will aim to identify, appraise and synthesise qualitative studies on ePrescribing/CPOE in hospital settings, with or without clinical decision support. Methods and analysis: Data sources will include the following bibliographic databases: MEDLINE, MEDLINE In Process, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Social Policy and Practice via Ovid, CINAHL via EBSCO, The Cochrane Library (CDSR, DARE and CENTRAL databases), Nursing and Allied Health Sources, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts via ProQuest and SCOPUS. In addition, other sources will be searched for ongoing studies (ClinicalTrials.gov) and grey literature: Healthcare Management Information Consortium, Conference Proceedings Citation Index (Web of Science) and Sociological abstracts. Studies will be independently screened for eligibility by 2 reviewers. Qualitative studies, either standalone or in the context of mixed-methods designs, reporting the perspectives of any actors involved in the implementation, management and use of ePrescribing/CPOE systems in hospital-based care settings will be included. Data extraction will be conducted by 2 reviewers using a piloted form. Quality appraisal will be based on criteria from the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist and Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research. Studies will not be excluded based on quality assessment. A postsynthesis sensitivity analysis will be undertaken. Data analysis will follow the thematic synthesis method. Ethics and dissemination: The study does not require ethical approval as primary data will not be collected. The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences.en
dc.formatapplication/pdfen
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherBMJen
dc.relation.urlhttps://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/6/7/e011858en
dc.rightsLicence for published version: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectAttitude of Health Personnelen
dc.subjectperceptionen
dc.subjectQualitative researchen
dc.subjecthospitalsen
dc.subjectMedical Order Entry Systemsen
dc.subjectelectronic prescribingen
dc.subjectSystematic Reviews as Topicen
dc.titlePerceptions and experiences of the implementation, management, use and optimisation of electronic prescribing systems in hospital settings: Protocol for a systematic review of qualitative studiesen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.eissn2044-6055
dc.identifier.journalBMJ Openen
dc.date.updated2019-12-02T14:44:32Z
dc.contributor.institutionInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK Research and Development, Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
pubs.place-of-publicationEngland
dc.date.accepted2016-06-17
rioxxterms.funderAston Universityen
rioxxterms.identifier.projectWMCLAHRC-2014-1en
rioxxterms.versionVoRen
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-12-03en
dc.source.volume6
dc.source.issue7
dc.source.beginpagee011858
dc.description.versionPublished version
refterms.dateFCD2019-12-03T15:34:31Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2019-12-03T15:34:42Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Perceptions and experiences of ...
Size:
602.9Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Licence for published version: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Licence for published version: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International