How do stakeholders experience the adoption of electronic prescribing systems in hospitals? A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractBACKGROUND:Electronic prescribing (ePrescribing) or computerised provider/physician order entry (CPOE) systems can improve the quality and safety of health services, but the translation of this into reduced harm for patients remains unclear. This review aimed to synthesise primary qualitative research relating to how stakeholders experience the adoption of ePrescribing/CPOE systems in hospitals, to help better understand why and how healthcare organisations have not yet realised the full potential of such systems and to inform future implementations and research. METHODS:We systematically searched 10 bibliographic databases and additional sources for citation searching and grey literature, with no restriction on date or publication language. Qualitative studies exploring the perspectives/experiences of stakeholders with the implementation, management, use and/or optimisation of ePrescribing/CPOE systems in hospitals were included. Quality assessment combined criteria from the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Qualitative Checklist and the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines. Data were synthesised thematically. RESULTS:79 articles were included. Stakeholders' perspectives reflected a mixed set of positive and negative implications of engaging in ePrescribing/CPOE as part of their work. These were underpinned by further-reaching change processes. Impacts reported were largely practice related rather than at the organisational level. Factors affecting the implementation process and actions undertaken prior to implementation were perceived as important in understanding ePrescribing/CPOE adoption and impact. CONCLUSIONS:Implementing organisations and teams should consider the breadth and depth of changes that ePrescribing/CPOE adoption can trigger rather than focus on discrete benefits/problems and favour implementation strategies that: consider the preimplementation context, are responsive to (and transparent about) organisational and stakeholder needs and agendas and which can be sustained effectively over time as implementations develop and gradually transition to routine use and system optimisation.
CitationFarre A, Heath G, Shaw K, et al (2019) How do stakeholders experience the adoption of electronic prescribing systems in hospitals? A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies, BMJ Quality & Safety, 28, pp. 1021-1031.
JournalBMJ Quality & Safety
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Perceptions and experiences of the implementation, management, use and optimisation of electronic prescribing systems in hospital settings: protocol for a systematic review of qualitative studies.
- Authors: Farre A, Bem D, Heath G, Shaw K, Cummins C
- Issue date: 2016 Jul 8
- Going digital: a narrative overview of the clinical and organisational impacts of eHealth technologies in hospital practice.
- Authors: Keasberry J, Scott IA, Sullivan C, Staib A, Ashby R
- Issue date: 2017 Dec
- Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
- Authors: Eddy K, Jordan Z, Stephenson M
- Issue date: 2016 Apr
- Healthcare stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): qualitative evidence synthesis.
- Authors: Xyrichis A, Iliopoulou K, Mackintosh NJ, Bench S, Terblanche M, Philippou J, Sandall J
- Issue date: 2021 Feb 18
- Effects of eHealth on hospital practice: synthesis of the current literature.
- Authors: Eden R, Burton-Jones A, Scott I, Staib A, Sullivan C
- Issue date: 2018 Sep