Tweets vs. Mendeley readers: How do these two social media metrics differ?
dc.contributor.author | Haustein, Stefanie | |
dc.contributor.author | Larivière, Vincent | |
dc.contributor.author | Thelwall, Mike | |
dc.contributor.author | Amyot, Didier | |
dc.contributor.author | Peters, Isabella | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-09-11T13:25:32Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-09-11T13:25:32Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-09-30 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Haustein, S., Larivière, V., Thelwall, M., Amyot, D. and Peters, I. (2014) Tweets vs. Mendeley readers: How do these two social media metrics differ? it - Information Technology, 56(5), DOI: 10.1515/itit-2014-1048. | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 2196-7032 | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1515/itit-2014-1048 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2436/622713 | |
dc.description.abstract | A set of 1.4 million biomedical papers was analyzed with regards to how often articles are mentioned on Twitter or saved by users on Mendeley. While Twitter is a microblogging platform used by a general audience to distribute information, Mendeley is a reference manager targeted at an academic user group to organize scholarly literature. Both platforms are used as sources for so-called altmetrics to measure a new kind of research impact. This analysis shows in how far they differ and compare to traditional citation impact metrics based on a large set of PubMed papers. | en |
dc.format | application/PDF | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | Walter de Gruyter | en |
dc.relation.url | https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/itit.2014.56.issue-5/itit-2014-1048/itit-2014-1048.xml | en |
dc.subject | ACM CSS | en |
dc.subject | human centered computing | en |
dc.subject | social networks | en |
dc.subject | altmetrics | en |
dc.subject | social media | en |
dc.subject | en | |
dc.subject | Mendeley | en |
dc.subject | citation analysis | en |
dc.subject | scholarly communication | en |
dc.title | Tweets vs. Mendeley readers: How do these two social media metrics differ? | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2196-7032 | |
dc.identifier.journal | it - Information Technology | en |
dc.date.updated | 2019-09-09T13:20:11Z | |
dc.date.accepted | 2014 | |
rioxxterms.funder | University of Wolverhampton | en |
rioxxterms.identifier.project | UOW110919MT | en |
rioxxterms.version | AM | en |
rioxxterms.licenseref.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | en |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2019-09-11 | en |
dc.source.volume | 56 | |
dc.source.issue | 5 | |
dc.description.version | Published version | |
refterms.dateFCD | 2019-09-11T13:25:22Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2019-09-11T13:25:33Z |