Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOkpako, O
dc.contributor.authorRajamani, HS
dc.contributor.authorPillai, P
dc.contributor.authorAnuebunwa, U
dc.contributor.authorShanti Swarup, K
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-27T11:07:43Z
dc.date.available2019-06-27T11:07:43Z
dc.date.issued2018-03-08
dc.identifier.citationOkpako, O., Rajamani, H., Pillai, P., Anuebunwa, U. & Shanti Swarup, K. (2018) A Comparative Assessment of Embedded Energy Storage and Electric Vehicle Integration in a Community Virtual Power Plant, Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, LNICST, vol. 231, pp. 127-141.en
dc.identifier.isbn9783319765709en
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-319-76571-6_13en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/622486
dc.description.abstract© 2018, ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering. Among the key objectives of the smart grid technology are to foster the grid integration of renewable energy as well as market participation of domestic energy consumers through demand response program. Energy storage remains a key component of the smart grid. Past works on integration of energy storage at the domestic side of the electricity grid has identified the electric vehicle technology (EV) and the embedded energy storage (EES) technology, etc. However, it was difficult to compare between these technologies in terms of business incentives and technical performance. This was investigated in this work, and the results are presented. It was propose to use percentage difference to compare between VPP with EES and VPP with EV. The results shows that the difference in prosumers incentives between VPP with EES and VPP with EV is very low. It is approximately 0.89%. However, the percentage difference in VPP operator profit between VPP with EES and VPP with EV is very high. It is approximately 85.3%. The VPP makes very high profit in the VPP EES case compared to VPP EV case. The same also applies to the VPP cumulative performance where the percentage difference in the VPP cumulative performance between VPP with EES and VPP with EV is approximately 10.9%. This has implication on the storage mechanism to be integrated in to a VPP at the domestic level as well the business model to be adopted.en
dc.formatapplication/PDFen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSpringer International Publishingen
dc.relation.urlhttps://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-76571-6_13en
dc.subjectprosumeren
dc.subjectbatteryen
dc.subjectvirtual power plant (VPP)en
dc.subjectgenetic algorithm (GA)en
dc.subjectsmart griden
dc.subjectstate of chargeen
dc.titleA Comparative Assessment of Embedded Energy Storage and Electric Vehicle Integration in a Community Virtual Power Planten
dc.typeConference contributionen
dc.identifier.eissn1867-822X
dc.identifier.journalLecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, LNICSTen
dc.date.updated2019-06-20T15:57:00Z
dc.date.accepted2018-03-01
rioxxterms.funderUniversity of Wolverhamptonen
rioxxterms.identifier.projectUOW270619PPen
rioxxterms.versionAMen
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-06-27en
dc.source.volume231
dc.source.beginpage127
dc.source.endpage141
dc.description.versionPublished version
refterms.dateFCD2019-06-27T11:06:47Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2019-06-27T11:07:43Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Okpako_et_al_Comparative_asses ...
Size:
746.9Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/