Best practices: in the 21st century, taxonomic decisions in herpetology are acceptable only when supported by a body of evidence and published via peer-review
dc.contributor.author | Kaiser, Hinrich | |
dc.contributor.author | Crother, Brian I. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kelly, Christopher M.R | |
dc.contributor.author | Luiselli, Luca | |
dc.contributor.author | O'Shea, Mark | |
dc.contributor.author | Ota, Hidetoshi | |
dc.contributor.author | Passos, Paulo | |
dc.contributor.author | Schleip, Wulf D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Wüster, Wolfgang | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-10-09T10:52:32Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-10-09T10:52:32Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0018-084X | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2436/621767 | |
dc.description | This paper was written by nine authors from five continents, and supported by a further 80 academics and many major herpetological societies including the World Congress of Herpetology, in reaction to burgeoning number of species descriptions being published in herpetology by a small number of individuals through their own self-published "journals" which lack any peer-review. | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.subject | Taxonomy | |
dc.subject | Nomenclature | |
dc.subject | Herpetology | |
dc.subject | Peer-review | |
dc.subject | Vanity publishing | |
dc.subject | Predatory Journals | |
dc.title | Best practices: in the 21st century, taxonomic decisions in herpetology are acceptable only when supported by a body of evidence and published via peer-review | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
dc.identifier.journal | Herpetological Review | |
dc.date.accepted | 2013-03 | |
rioxxterms.funder | University of Wolverhampton | |
rioxxterms.identifier.project | UOW09102018MO | |
rioxxterms.version | AM | |
rioxxterms.licenseref.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2013-01-25 | |
refterms.dateFCD | 2018-10-09T10:52:32Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2018-10-09T10:52:32Z |