Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKaiser, Hinrich
dc.contributor.authorCrother, Brian I.
dc.contributor.authorKelly, Christopher M.R
dc.contributor.authorLuiselli, Luca
dc.contributor.authorO'Shea, Mark
dc.contributor.authorOta, Hidetoshi
dc.contributor.authorPassos, Paulo
dc.contributor.authorSchleip, Wulf D.
dc.contributor.authorWüster, Wolfgang
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-09T10:52:32Z
dc.date.available2018-10-09T10:52:32Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn0018-084X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/621767
dc.descriptionThis paper was written by nine authors from five continents, and supported by a further 80 academics and many major herpetological societies including the World Congress of Herpetology, in reaction to burgeoning number of species descriptions being published in herpetology by a small number of individuals through their own self-published "journals" which lack any peer-review.
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectTaxonomy
dc.subjectNomenclature
dc.subjectHerpetology
dc.subjectPeer-review
dc.subjectVanity publishing
dc.subjectPredatory Journals
dc.titleBest practices: in the 21st century, taxonomic decisions in herpetology are acceptable only when supported by a body of evidence and published via peer-review
dc.typeJournal article
dc.identifier.journalHerpetological Review
dc.date.accepted2013-03
rioxxterms.funderUniversity of Wolverhampton
rioxxterms.identifier.projectUOW09102018MO
rioxxterms.versionAM
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2013-01-25
refterms.dateFCD2018-10-09T10:52:32Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2018-10-09T10:52:32Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Herpetological Review.pdf
Size:
279.7Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record