Cost-effectiveness of using small vertebrates as indicators of disturbance.
Authors
Peck, Mika RobertMaddock, Simon T
Morales, Jorge Noe
Oñate, Hugolino
Mafla-Endara, Paola
Peñafiel, Vanessa Aguirre
Torres-Carvajal, Omar
Pozo-Rivera, Wilmer E
Cueva-Arroyo, Xavier A
Tolhurst, Bryony A
Issue Date
2014-10-01
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
In species-rich tropical forests, effective biodiversity management demands measures of progress, yet budgetary limitations typically constrain capacity of decision makers to assess response of biological communities to habitat change. One approach is to identify ecological-disturbance indicator species (EDIS) whose monitoring is also monetarily cost-effective. These species can be identified by determining individual species' responses to disturbance across a gradient; however, such responses may be confounded by factors other than disturbance. For example, in mountain environments the effects of anthropogenic habitat alteration are commonly confounded by elevation. EDIS have been identified with the indicator value (IndVal) metric, but there are weaknesses in the application of this approach in complex montane systems. We surveyed birds, small mammals, bats, and leaf-litter lizards in differentially disturbed cloud forest of the Ecuadorian Andes. We then incorporated elevation in generalized linear (mixed) models (GL(M)M) to screen for EDIS in the data set. Finally, we used rarefaction of species accumulation data to compare relative monetary costs of identifying and monitoring EDIS at equal sampling effort, based on species richness. Our GL(M)M generated greater numbers of EDIS but fewer characteristic species relative to IndVal. In absolute terms birds were the most cost-effective of the 4 taxa surveyed. We found one low-cost bird EDIS. In terms of the number of indicators generated as a proportion of species richness, EDIS of small mammals were the most cost-effective. Our approach has the potential to be a useful tool for facilitating more sustainable management of Andean forest systems.Publisher
WileyJournal
Conservation BiologyPubMed ID
25124528Type
Journal articleLanguage
enae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1111/cobi.12373
Scopus Count
Collections
The following licence applies to the copyright and re-use of this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Related articles
- The cost-effectiveness of biodiversity surveys in tropical forests.
- Authors: Gardner TA, Barlow J, Araujo IS, Avila-Pires TC, Bonaldo AB, Costa JE, Esposito MC, Ferreira LV, Hawes J, Hernandez MI, Hoogmoed MS, Leite RN, Lo-Man-Hung NF, Malcolm JR, Martins MB, Mestre LA, Miranda-Santos R, Overal WL, Parry L, Peters SL, Ribeiro-Junior MA, da Silva MN, da Silva Motta C, Peres CA
- Issue date: 2008 Feb
- Benefits to poorly studied taxa of conservation of bird and mammal diversity on islands.
- Authors: Aslan C, Holmes N, Tershy B, Spatz D, Croll DA
- Issue date: 2015 Feb
- Selective‐logging and oil palm: multitaxon impacts, biodiversity indicators, and trade‐offs for conservation planning.
- Authors: Edwards DP, Magrach A, Woodcock P, Ji Y, Lim NT-, Edwards FA, Larsen TH, Hsu WW, Benedick S, Khen CV, Chung AYC, Reynolds G, Fisher B, Laurance WF, Wilcove DS, Hamer KC, Yu DW
- Issue date: 2014
- Sensitivity of tropical montane birds to anthropogenic disturbance and management strategies for their conservation in agricultural landscapes.
- Authors: Ausprey IJ, Newell FL, Robinson SK
- Issue date: 2023 Dec
- Correlation and persistence of hunting and logging impacts on tropical rainforest mammals.
- Authors: Brodie JF, Giordano AJ, Zipkin EF, Bernard H, Mohd-Azlan J, Ambu L
- Issue date: 2015 Feb