Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRoland, Damian
dc.contributor.authorMatheson, David
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-05T08:44:55Z
dc.date.available2018-07-05T08:44:55Z
dc.date.issued2012-06
dc.identifier.citationNew theory from an old technique: the Rolma matrices. 2012, 9 (3):143-7 Clin Teach
dc.identifier.issn1743-498X
dc.identifier.pmid22587311
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1743-498X.2011.00520.x
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/621442
dc.description.abstractUnderstanding the reasons behind non-adherence to clinical practice guidelines is a complex process. Many explanatory models have been proposed that are grounded in qualitative theory. The 2 × 2 matrix has often been used to condense this potentially complex information into a format understandable to clinicians without educational or qualitative backgrounds.
dc.formatapplication/PDF
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing
dc.subjectclinical reasoning
dc.subjectclinical thinking
dc.subject.meshAlgorithms
dc.subject.meshClinical Competence
dc.subject.meshEvidence-Based Practice
dc.subject.meshGuideline Adherence
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshModels, Educational
dc.subject.meshTeaching
dc.subject.meshUnited Kingdom
dc.titleNew theory from an old technique: the Rolma matrices.
dc.typeJournal article
dc.identifier.journalThe clinical teacher
html.description.abstractUnderstanding the reasons behind non-adherence to clinical practice guidelines is a complex process. Many explanatory models have been proposed that are grounded in qualitative theory. The 2 × 2 matrix has often been used to condense this potentially complex information into a format understandable to clinicians without educational or qualitative backgrounds.


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record