Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMatheson, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorMatheson, David
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T09:43:53Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T09:43:53Z
dc.date.issued2008-02
dc.identifier.citationCommunity development: Freire and Grameen in the Barrowfield Project, Glasgow, Scotland 2008, 18 (1):30 Development in Practice
dc.identifier.issn0961-4524
dc.identifier.issn1364-9213
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09614520701778330
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/621431
dc.description.abstractThis article is an attempt to examine one of the better-known failures in UK community development – the Barrowfield Project in Glasgow (1986–1996) – and to compare and contrast it with other attempts at community development, especially some associated with the work of Mohammad Yunus and the Grameen Bank, and the legacy of Paulo Freire. We conclude that both Freire and Yunus make assumptions about the pre-existence of community which limit the potential impact of their ideas in an area such as Barrowfield, where anomie and apathy were rife. We further find that just as actions intended to be liberating may reinforce the dominant hegemony, the converse may on occasion also be true. In recent years the Barrowfield Project has risen from the ashes of its previous demise, and so the present work needs to be seen in that context.
dc.formatapplication/PDF
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09614520701778330
dc.subjectsocial sector
dc.subjectgender and social diversity
dc.subjectaid
dc.subjectmethods
dc.subjectwestern europe
dc.titleCommunity development: Freire and Grameen in the Barrowfield Project, Glasgow, Scotland
dc.typeJournal article
dc.identifier.journalDevelopment in Practice
html.description.abstractThis article is an attempt to examine one of the better-known failures in UK community development – the Barrowfield Project in Glasgow (1986–1996) – and to compare and contrast it with other attempts at community development, especially some associated with the work of Mohammad Yunus and the Grameen Bank, and the legacy of Paulo Freire. We conclude that both Freire and Yunus make assumptions about the pre-existence of community which limit the potential impact of their ideas in an area such as Barrowfield, where anomie and apathy were rife. We further find that just as actions intended to be liberating may reinforce the dominant hegemony, the converse may on occasion also be true. In recent years the Barrowfield Project has risen from the ashes of its previous demise, and so the present work needs to be seen in that context.


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record