Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTraxler, John
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-20T14:54:25Z
dc.date.available2018-03-20T14:54:25Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-08
dc.identifier.citationMobile Learning: The Philosophical Challenges, Problems and Implications of Defining and Theorising 2018 Progressio: South African Journal for Open and Distance Learning Practice
dc.identifier.issn0256-8853
dc.identifier.doi10.25159/0256-8853/1785
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/621194
dc.description.abstractThis essay uses the popular and perennial topic of definition as a way to explore differing perspectives and expectations amongst the various communities whose interests and activities overlap in what has come to be called mobile learning, and to discuss the role and choice of theory in mobile learning. The purpose of the paper is to add to the academic foundations of mobile learning. These communities continue to make progress and continue also to make mistakes; the researchers continue to provide ideas and examples for practitioners, policy-makers, activists and developers, but often on assumptions, logic and inferences that are not transparent or robust. This is the problem being addressed. Here we seek to add greater critical rigour to the language and expectations being deployed. The essay is by nature not definitive, but seeks merely to expose some of the lack of clarity when mobile learning is discussed and promoted.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUnisa Press
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.upjournals.co.za/index.php/Progressio/article/view/1785
dc.subjectmobile learning
dc.subjectchoice of theory
dc.subjectacademic foundations
dc.subjectassumptions
dc.subjectgenus
dc.subjectdifferentia
dc.titleMobile Learning: The Philosophical Challenges, Problems and Implications of Defining and Theorising
dc.typeJournal article
dc.identifier.journalProgressio: South African Journal for Open and Distance Learning Practice
dc.date.accepted2017-10
rioxxterms.funderUniversity of Wolverhampton
rioxxterms.identifier.projectUOW200318JT
rioxxterms.versionAM
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-01-08
dc.source.volume39
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.beginpage1
dc.source.endpage18
refterms.dateFCD2018-10-19T09:01:27Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
html.description.abstractThis essay uses the popular and perennial topic of definition as a way to explore differing perspectives and expectations amongst the various communities whose interests and activities overlap in what has come to be called mobile learning, and to discuss the role and choice of theory in mobile learning. The purpose of the paper is to add to the academic foundations of mobile learning. These communities continue to make progress and continue also to make mistakes; the researchers continue to provide ideas and examples for practitioners, policy-makers, activists and developers, but often on assumptions, logic and inferences that are not transparent or robust. This is the problem being addressed. Here we seek to add greater critical rigour to the language and expectations being deployed. The essay is by nature not definitive, but seeks merely to expose some of the lack of clarity when mobile learning is discussed and promoted.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
1785-12341-2-CE_revisedJT.pdf
Size:
213.4Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/