Education case study reports reflection on teaching strategies for pharmacy students
dc.contributor.author | Morrissey, Hana | |
dc.contributor.author | Ball, Patrick | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-02-01T15:36:12Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-02-01T15:36:12Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-07-30 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Morrissey, H., Ball, P. (2016) 'Education case study reports reflection on teaching strategies for pharmacy students', Pharmacy Education, 16 (1) 112 - 117 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1560-2214 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2436/621071 | |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: Teaching should meet the needs of all types of learner present in the class room; the activist, the reflector, the theorist and the pragmatist who also have diverse backgrounds, levels of education and are from different age groups. Aim: The aim of the four projects was to improve students’ engagement and success. Method: New teaching strategies were trialled to improve students’ engagement and successes with topics which according to their feedback were considered ‘dry’. The author utilised techniques such as flipping the class-room, simulation, case or problem based learning; and group work replacing traditional lectures. First, third and fourth year students were asked to prepare for the in-class activities at home using the lectures or simulation software. Results: The strategies were effective in a small class size of 15-20 students, with improved attendance and participation, improved fail/pass rate and number of students achieving credit or pass; however there was no significant change in the number of students achieving high distinction or distinction. Evaluation: Reproducibility is an important part of the experiment to demonstrate that the results can be trusted. Success with one or two cohorts is not sufficient to adopt a method of teaching. Ongoing evaluation is essential to eliminate cohort-related effects prior to implementation. It is not clear if the achieved results would be achievable in larger classes due to the reduction in student: lecturer ratio and limitation of class room time to allow all students to participate. | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | FIP | |
dc.relation.url | http://pharmacyeducation.fip.org/pharmacyeducation/article/view/432 | |
dc.subject | Simulation | |
dc.subject | Flipping the Classroom | |
dc.subject | Pharmacokinetics | |
dc.subject | Clean Room | |
dc.subject | Palliative Care | |
dc.subject | Peer Review | |
dc.title | Education case study reports reflection on teaching strategies for pharmacy students | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
dc.identifier.journal | Pharmacy Education | |
dc.date.accepted | 2016-01-01 | |
rioxxterms.funder | Jisc | |
rioxxterms.identifier.project | UoW010218HM | |
rioxxterms.version | AM | |
rioxxterms.licenseref.uri | https://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2018-12-01 | |
dc.source.volume | 16 | |
dc.source.issue | 1 | |
dc.source.beginpage | 112 | |
dc.source.endpage | 117 | |
refterms.dateFCD | 2018-10-19T09:28:38Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
html.description.abstract | Introduction: Teaching should meet the needs of all types of learner present in the class room; the activist, the reflector, the theorist and the pragmatist who also have diverse backgrounds, levels of education and are from different age groups. Aim: The aim of the four projects was to improve students’ engagement and success. Method: New teaching strategies were trialled to improve students’ engagement and successes with topics which according to their feedback were considered ‘dry’. The author utilised techniques such as flipping the class-room, simulation, case or problem based learning; and group work replacing traditional lectures. First, third and fourth year students were asked to prepare for the in-class activities at home using the lectures or simulation software. Results: The strategies were effective in a small class size of 15-20 students, with improved attendance and participation, improved fail/pass rate and number of students achieving credit or pass; however there was no significant change in the number of students achieving high distinction or distinction. Evaluation: Reproducibility is an important part of the experiment to demonstrate that the results can be trusted. Success with one or two cohorts is not sufficient to adopt a method of teaching. Ongoing evaluation is essential to eliminate cohort-related effects prior to implementation. It is not clear if the achieved results would be achievable in larger classes due to the reduction in student: lecturer ratio and limitation of class room time to allow all students to participate. |