A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological predictors of successful assisted reproductive technologies
dc.contributor.author | Purewal, Satvinder | |
dc.contributor.author | Chapman, Sarah | |
dc.contributor.author | van den Akker, Olga | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-12-11T10:27:47Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-12-11T10:27:47Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-12-07 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Purewal, S., Chapman, S., van den Akker, O. 'A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological predictors of successful assisted reproductive technologies', BMC Research Notes, 10:711 doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-3049-z | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s13104-017-3049-z | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2436/620974 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to perform an updated investigation of the effects of depression and anxiety on pregnancy outcomes following assisted reproductive technologies. A bibliographic search was performed using PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, Science Direct databases. Data retrieved were analysed using a random effects model to estimate standardised mean differences. Results: Of the 22 included studies, 18 investigated depression, 15 state anxiety, and seven trait anxiety. Data from 4018 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Results indicated that women who achieved pregnancy or a live birth reported lower levels of depression pre-treatment than those who did not, although the effects were small d = − 0.177 (95% CI − 0.327 to − 0.027, z = 2.309, p = 0.021). These results were consistent under different methodological conditions and the quality of these observational were graded as satisfactory. A similar pattern was seen for state (d = − 0.096, 95% CI − 0.180 to − 0.012: z = 2.241, p = 0.025) and trait anxiety (d = − 0.188, 95% CI − 0.007 to 0.356, z = 2.181, p = 0.029). More research is needed to investigate the impact of psychological variables on assisted reproductive technologies outcomes and moderator influences during assisted reproductive technologies processes. | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Academy small grant award (SG100026). | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Springer | |
dc.relation.url | https://bmcresnotes.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13104-017-3049-z | |
dc.title | A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological predictors of successful assisted reproductive technologies | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
dc.identifier.journal | BMC Research Notes | |
dc.contributor.institution | University of Wolverhampton | |
dc.date.accepted | 2017-11-30 | |
rioxxterms.funder | University of Wolverhampton | |
rioxxterms.identifier.project | BA | |
rioxxterms.version | AM | |
rioxxterms.licenseref.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2017-12-07 | |
dc.source.volume | 10 | |
dc.source.issue | 711 | |
refterms.dateFCD | 2018-08-14T13:26:39Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2018-08-21T14:40:58Z |