Abstract
This article investigates whether Microsoft Academic can use its web search component to identify early citations to recently published articles to help solve the problem of delays in research evaluations caused by the need to wait for citation counts to accrue. The results for 44,398 articles in Nature, Science and seven library and information science journals 1996-2017 show that Microsoft Academic and Scopus citation counts are similar for all years, with no early citation advantage for either. In contrast, Mendeley reader counts are substantially higher for more recent articles. Thus, Microsoft Academic appears to be broadly like Scopus for citation count data, and is apparently not more able to take advantage of online preprints to find early citations.Citation
Thelwall, M. (2017). Does Microsoft Academic find early citations? Scientometrics, 114 (1), pp 325-334.Publisher
SpringerJournal
ScientometricsAdditional Links
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11192-017-2558-9Type
Journal articleLanguage
enDescription
This is an accepted manuscript of an article published by Springer in Scientometrics on 27/10/2017, available online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2558-9 The accepted version of the publication may differ from the final published version.ISSN
0138-9130ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1007/s11192-017-2558-9
Scopus Count
The following licence applies to the copyright and re-use of this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/