Fluctuation scaling, the calibration of dispersion, and the detection of differences
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractFluctuation scaling describes the relationship between the mean and standard deviation of a set of measurements. An example is Horwitz scaling which has been reported from inter-laboratory studies. Horwitz and similar studies have reported simple exponential and segmented scaling laws with exponents (α) typically between 0.85 (Horwitz) and 1 when not operating near a detection limit. When approaching a detection limit the exponents change and approach an apparently Gaussian (α = 0) model. This behavior is generally presented as a property of inter-laboratory studies which makes controlled replication to understand the behavior costly to perform. To assess the contribution of instrumentation to larger scale fluctuation scaling, we measured the behavior of two inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) systems, in two laboratories measuring thulium using 2 emission lines. The standard deviation universally increased with the uncalibrated signal indicating the system was heteroscedastic. The response from all lines and both instruments was consistent with a single exponential dispersion model having parameters α = 1.09 and β = 0.0035. No evidence of Horwitz scaling was found and there was no evidence of Poisson noise limiting behavior. The “Gaussian” component was a consequence of background subtraction for all lines and both instruments. The observation of a simple exponential dispersion model in the data allows for the definition of a difference detection limit (DDL) with universal applicability to systems following known dispersion. The DDL is the minimum separation between two points along a dispersion model required to claim they are different according to a particular statistical test. The DDL scales transparently with the mean and works at any location in a response function.
CitationHolland R., Rebmann R., Williams C., Hanley QS. (2017) 'Fluctuation Scaling, the Calibration of Dispersion, and the Detection of Differences', Analytical Chemistry, 89(21) p. 11568-11575. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b02909
DescriptionThis is an accepted manuscript of an article published by American Chemical Society in Analytical Chemistry on 11/10/2017, available online: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b02909 The accepted version of the publication may differ from the final published version.
The following licence applies to the copyright and re-use of this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/CC BY-NC-ND 4.0