Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Joseph J.
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Marie H.
dc.contributor.authorMacDonncha, Ciaran
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Niamh
dc.contributor.authorNevill, Alan M.
dc.contributor.authorWoods, Catherine B.
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-11T14:02:38Z
dc.date.available2017-05-11T14:02:38Z
dc.date.issued2017-03-23
dc.identifier.citationMurphy, JJ., Murphy, MH., MacDonncha, C., Murphy, N., Nevill, A., Woods, CB. (2017) 'Validity and Reliability of Three Self-Report Instruments for Assessing Attainment of Physical Activity Guidelines in University Students', Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 21 (3) p 134-141en
dc.identifier.issn1091-367Xen
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/1091367X.2017.1297711
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/620475
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to compare the validity and reliability of three short physical activity self-report instruments to determine their potential for use with university student populations. The participants (N = 155; 44.5% male; 22.9 ± 5.13 years) wore an accelerometer for 9 consecutive days and completed a single-item measure, the a brief two item measure and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire—Short Form questionnaires on day 1 and 9. Correlations between self-reported and accelerometer derived moderate-to-vigorous physical activity levels were moderate for the International Physical Activity Questionnaire—Short Form, while poor for the single-item measure and the a brief two item measure. The agreement level was high with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire—Short Form (77.4%) and moderate for both the single-item measure (45.2 %) and a brief two item measure (44.5 %). The intraclass correlations between the two administrations were moderate to strong across all measures (0.52–0.70) in 133 participants. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire—Short Form is the most suitable of these three self-report instruments for use with this population due to higher correlations and levels of agreement with accelerometry.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1091367X.2017.1297711en
dc.rightsArchived with thanks to Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Scienceen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectmeasurementen
dc.subjectreliabilityen
dc.subjectuniversity studentsen
dc.subjectvalidityen
dc.titleValidity and reliability of three self-report instruments for assessing attainment of physical activity guidelines in university studentsen
dc.typeJournal article
dc.identifier.journalMeasurement in Physical Education and Exercise Scienceen
dc.date.accepted2017-03-08
rioxxterms.funderUniversity of Wolverhamptonen
rioxxterms.identifier.projectUOW110517ANen
rioxxterms.versionAMen
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2018-09-23en
dc.source.volume21
dc.source.issue3
dc.source.beginpage134
dc.source.endpage141
refterms.dateFCD2019-03-20T10:27:14Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2018-09-23T00:00:00Z
html.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to compare the validity and reliability of three short physical activity self-report instruments to determine their potential for use with university student populations. The participants (N = 155; 44.5% male; 22.9 ± 5.13 years) wore an accelerometer for 9 consecutive days and completed a single-item measure, the a brief two item measure and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire—Short Form questionnaires on day 1 and 9. Correlations between self-reported and accelerometer derived moderate-to-vigorous physical activity levels were moderate for the International Physical Activity Questionnaire—Short Form, while poor for the single-item measure and the a brief two item measure. The agreement level was high with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire—Short Form (77.4%) and moderate for both the single-item measure (45.2 %) and a brief two item measure (44.5 %). The intraclass correlations between the two administrations were moderate to strong across all measures (0.52–0.70) in 133 participants. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire—Short Form is the most suitable of these three self-report instruments for use with this population due to higher correlations and levels of agreement with accelerometry.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Revised Copy (Changes Accepted).pdf
Size:
227.2Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Archived with thanks to Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Archived with thanks to Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science