Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDevonport, Tracey
dc.contributor.authorNicholls, Wendy
dc.contributor.authorFullerton, Christopher L.
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-13T14:42:52Z
dc.date.available2017-02-13T14:42:52Z
dc.date.issued2017-03-20
dc.identifier.issn1359-1053
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1359105317697813
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/620373
dc.description.abstractA systematic review was completed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive search of four electronic databases (2004-2015) yielded 60017 articles, of which 29 met inclusion criteria. Included studies performed poorly on data quality analysis in terms of randomization and controlling for confounding factors. Participant’s BMI scores range from 19.73 (SD = 1.54) to 28.4 (SD = 1.4) kg/m2. Where positive and negative affect were compared, food was more likely to be consumed in response to positive affect. With regards to discrete emotions; stress, depression, and sadness consistently elicited eating behaviours that fall outside of nutritional recommendations (e.g., increased food intake, poor nutritional food choices). The role of moderators including individual differences in dietary restraint and emotional eating, as well as methodological considerations, such as means of eliciting and measuring emotions, may account for equivocality with regards to some emotion and eating associations. The paper concludes with recommendations for future research and implications for practice.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSage Publications LTD
dc.relation.urlhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1359105317697813?journalCode=hpqa
dc.subjectemotional eating
dc.subjectself-regulation
dc.subjectrestrained eating
dc.subjecteating behaviour
dc.subjectemotions
dc.titleA systematic review of the association between emotions and eating behaviour in normal and overweight adult populations
dc.typeJournal article
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Health Psychology
dc.date.accepted2017-02-01
rioxxterms.funderUniversity of Wolverhampton
rioxxterms.identifier.projectUoW130217TD
rioxxterms.versionAM
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-05-01
dc.source.volume24
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.beginpage3
dc.source.endpage24
refterms.dateFCD2018-07-18T15:13:17Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2017-05-01T00:00:00Z
html.description.abstractA systematic review was completed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive search of four electronic databases (2004-2015) yielded 60017 articles, of which 29 met inclusion criteria. Included studies performed poorly on data quality analysis in terms of randomization and controlling for confounding factors. Participant’s BMI scores range from 19.73 (SD = 1.54) to 28.4 (SD = 1.4) kg/m2. Where positive and negative affect were compared, food was more likely to be consumed in response to positive affect. With regards to discrete emotions; stress, depression, and sadness consistently elicited eating behaviours that fall outside of nutritional recommendations (e.g., increased food intake, poor nutritional food choices). The role of moderators including individual differences in dietary restraint and emotional eating, as well as methodological considerations, such as means of eliciting and measuring emotions, may account for equivocality with regards to some emotion and eating associations. The paper concludes with recommendations for future research and implications for practice.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Devonport_SR_Emotion_and eatin ...
Size:
608.3Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record