The dangers of estimating V˙O2max using linear, nonexercise prediction models
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractPurpose This study aimed to compare the accuracy and goodness of fit of two competing models (linear vs allometric) when estimating V˙O2max (mL·kg−1·min−1) using nonexercise prediction models. Methods The two competing models were fitted to the V˙O2max (mL·kg−1·min−1) data taken from two previously published studies. Study 1 (the Allied Dunbar National Fitness Survey) recruited 1732 randomly selected healthy participants, 16 yr and older, from 30 English parliamentary constituencies. Estimates of V˙O2max were obtained using a progressive incremental test on a motorized treadmill. In study 2, maximal oxygen uptake was measured directly during a fatigue limited treadmill test in older men (n = 152) and women (n = 146) 55 to 86 yr old. Results In both studies, the quality of fit associated with estimating V˙O2max (mL·kg−1·min−1) was superior using allometric rather than linear (additive) models based on all criteria (R2, maximum log-likelihood, and Akaike information criteria). Results suggest that linear models will systematically overestimate V˙O2max for participants in their 20s and underestimate V˙O2max for participants in their 60s and older. The residuals saved from the linear models were neither normally distributed nor independent of the predicted values nor age. This will probably explain the absence of a key quadratic age2 term in the linear models, crucially identified using allometric models. Not only does the curvilinear age decline within an exponential function follow a more realistic age decline (the right-hand side of a bell-shaped curve), but the allometric models identified either a stature-to-body mass ratio (study 1) or a fat-free mass-to-body mass ratio (study 2), both associated with leanness when estimating V˙O2max. Conclusions Adopting allometric models will provide more accurate predictions of V˙O2max (mL·kg−1·min−1) using plausible, biologically sound, and interpretable models.
CitationNevill, AM., Cooke, CB. (2017) 'The Dangers of Estimating V˙O2max Using Linear, Nonexercise Prediction Models', Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 49(5) pp. 1036-1042. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001178
PublisherAmerican College of Sports Medicine
JournalMedicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
The following licence applies to the copyright and re-use of this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Archived with thanks to Medicine and science in sports and exercise
- Improving reference equations for cardiorespiratory fitness using multiplicative allometric rather than additive linear models: Data from the Fitness Registry and the Importance of Exercise National Database Registry.
- Authors: Nevill AM, Myers J, Kaminsky LA, Arena R
- Issue date: 2019 Nov - Dec
- Validity of a total body recumbent stepper exercise test to assess cardiorespiratory fitness.
- Authors: Billinger SA, Loudon JK, Gajewski BJ
- Issue date: 2008 Sep
- Reference values for cardiorespiratory response and fitness on the treadmill in a 20- to 85-year-old population.
- Authors: Edvardsen E, Hansen BH, Holme IM, Dyrstad SM, Anderssen SA
- Issue date: 2013 Jul
- Submaximal Exercise-Based Equations to Predict Maximal Oxygen Uptake in Older Adults: A Systematic Review.
- Authors: Smith AE, Evans H, Parfitt G, Eston R, Ferrar K
- Issue date: 2016 Jun
- Validation of Maximal, Submaximal, and Nonexercise Indirect [Formula: see text]O<sub>2</sub>max Estimations at 2600 m Altitude.
- Authors: Duperly J, Serrato M, Forero NI, Jimenez-Mora MA, Mendivil CO, Lobelo F
- Issue date: 2020 Jun