Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStylos, Nikolaos
dc.contributor.authorBellou, Victoria
dc.contributor.authorAndronikidis, Andreas
dc.contributor.authorVassiliadis, Chris A.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-05T10:13:29Z
dc.date.available2017-01-05T10:13:29Z
dc.date.issued2016-11-16
dc.identifier.citationStylos, N., Bellou, V., Andronikidis, A., & Vassiliadis, CA. (2017) 'Linking the dots among destination images, place attachment, and revisit intentions: A study among British and Russian tourists', Tourism Management, 60, pp. 15-29.
dc.identifier.issn0261-5177
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tourman.2016.11.006
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/620325
dc.description.abstractLimited evidence suggests that the incorporation of both image components (cognitive, affective, and conative) and holistic image is meaningful for predicting tourists' revisit intentions. Extending this line of research, the present study aims to unravel the relative influence that each component of image has directly and indirectly, via holistic image, on revisit intentions. In doing so, we incorporate two national samples (British and Russians) of diverse tourist profile and significantly different levels of visitation frequency to investigate place attachment as a moderator. Evidence from 1362 British and 1164 Russian tourists indicated that all image components have a positive indirect effect on revisit intention via holistic image, while conative has also a direct one. As expected, the image components rank differently for British and Russian tourists. The indirect effects of destination images on revisit intention, except conative, are conditional and, interestingly, most of these are stronger for tourists with low PA.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.urlhttp://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0261517716302072
dc.subjectDestination image
dc.subjectPlace attachment
dc.subjectRevisit Intention
dc.subjectModerated mediation
dc.subjectUK
dc.subjectRussia
dc.titleLinking the dots among destination images, place attachment, and revisit intentions: A study among British and Russian tourists
dc.typeJournal article
dc.identifier.journalTourism Management
dc.date.accepted2016-11-04
rioxxterms.funderUniversity of Wolverhampton
rioxxterms.identifier.projectUoW050117NS
rioxxterms.versionAM
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2018-11-06
dc.source.volume60
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.beginpage15
dc.source.endpage29
refterms.dateFCD2018-10-18T15:44:38Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2019-04-29T11:56:37Z
html.description.abstractLimited evidence suggests that the incorporation of both image components (cognitive, affective, and conative) and holistic image is meaningful for predicting tourists' revisit intentions. Extending this line of research, the present study aims to unravel the relative influence that each component of image has directly and indirectly, via holistic image, on revisit intentions. In doing so, we incorporate two national samples (British and Russians) of diverse tourist profile and significantly different levels of visitation frequency to investigate place attachment as a moderator. Evidence from 1362 British and 1164 Russian tourists indicated that all image components have a positive indirect effect on revisit intention via holistic image, while conative has also a direct one. As expected, the image components rank differently for British and Russian tourists. The indirect effects of destination images on revisit intention, except conative, are conditional and, interestingly, most of these are stronger for tourists with low PA.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version
Thumbnail
Name:
Linking the dots among destination ...
Size:
1.008Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/CC BY-NC-ND 4.0