The loss of short-term visual representations over time: decay or temporal distinctiveness?
dc.contributor.author | Mercer, Tom | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-11-21T15:30:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-11-21T15:30:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-12-31 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Mercer, T. (2014). The loss of short-term visual representations over time: Decay or temporal distinctiveness? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 2281-2288. doi:10.1037/a0038141 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1939-1277 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 25314045 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1037/a0038141 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2436/620291 | |
dc.description | This is an accepted manuscript of an article published by American Psychological Association in Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance in 2014, available online: https://doi.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0038141 The accepted version of the publication may differ from the final published version. | |
dc.description.abstract | There has been much recent interest in the loss of visual short-term memories over the passage of time. According to decay theory, visual representations are gradually forgotten as time passes, reflecting a slow and steady distortion of the memory trace. However, this is controversial and decay effects can be explained in other ways. The present experiment aimed to reexamine the maintenance and loss of visual information over the short term. Decay and temporal distinctiveness models were tested using a delayed discrimination task, in which participants compared complex and novel objects over unfilled retention intervals of variable length. Experiment 1 found no significant change in the accuracy of visual memory from 2 to 6 s, but the gap separating trials reliably influenced task performance. Experiment 2 found evidence for information loss at a 10-s retention interval, but temporally separating trials restored the fidelity of visual memory, possibly because temporally isolated representations are distinct from older memory traces. In conclusion, visual representations lose accuracy at some point after 6 s, but only within temporally crowded contexts. These findings highlight the importance of temporal distinctiveness within visual short-term memory. | |
dc.language | ENG | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | American Psychological Association | |
dc.relation.url | http://wk6kg9sd8m.search.serialssolutions.com/?sid=sersol&SS_jc=JOURNOFEXPPS&title=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Human%20perception%20and%20performance | |
dc.subject | Visual memory | |
dc.subject | decay | |
dc.subject | temporal distinctiveness | |
dc.subject | forgetting | |
dc.subject | short-term memory | |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | |
dc.subject.mesh | Association Learning | |
dc.subject.mesh | Color Perception | |
dc.subject.mesh | Depth Perception | |
dc.subject.mesh | Discrimination Learning | |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | |
dc.subject.mesh | Memory, Short-Term | |
dc.subject.mesh | Orientation | |
dc.subject.mesh | Pattern Recognition, Visual | |
dc.subject.mesh | Reaction Time | |
dc.subject.mesh | Retention (Psychology) | |
dc.subject.mesh | Young Adult | |
dc.title | The loss of short-term visual representations over time: decay or temporal distinctiveness? | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
dc.identifier.journal | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance | |
rioxxterms.version | AM | |
rioxxterms.licenseref.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
dc.source.volume | 40 | |
dc.source.issue | 6 | |
dc.source.beginpage | 2281 | |
dc.source.endpage | 2288 | |
refterms.dateFCD | 2020-12-17T10:44:49Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2018-08-21T13:34:07Z | |
html.description.abstract | There has been much recent interest in the loss of visual short-term memories over the passage of time. According to decay theory, visual representations are gradually forgotten as time passes, reflecting a slow and steady distortion of the memory trace. However, this is controversial and decay effects can be explained in other ways. The present experiment aimed to reexamine the maintenance and loss of visual information over the short term. Decay and temporal distinctiveness models were tested using a delayed discrimination task, in which participants compared complex and novel objects over unfilled retention intervals of variable length. Experiment 1 found no significant change in the accuracy of visual memory from 2 to 6 s, but the gap separating trials reliably influenced task performance. Experiment 2 found evidence for information loss at a 10-s retention interval, but temporally separating trials restored the fidelity of visual memory, possibly because temporally isolated representations are distinct from older memory traces. In conclusion, visual representations lose accuracy at some point after 6 s, but only within temporally crowded contexts. These findings highlight the importance of temporal distinctiveness within visual short-term memory. |