Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPippa, Stefano
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-09T16:26:42Z
dc.date.available2016-11-09T16:26:42Z
dc.date.issued2016-09-01
dc.identifier.citationPipa, S. (2016) 'The necessity of contingency: Rereading Althusser on structural causality', Radical Philosophy, (199), pp. 15-25.
dc.identifier.issn0300-211X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/620275
dc.description.abstractAmong the concepts proposed by Althusser in the course of his famous symptomatic reading of Marx’s Capital, structural causality plays a central role. Extrapolated from Marx’s writings via a detour through the philosophy of Spinoza, it came to represent the concept in which Althusser summed up ‘Marx’s immense theoretical revolution’. [1] As is well known, for Althusser, by breaking with the other two models of causality available in Marx’s time (the mechanistic causality derived from Descartes and the ‘expressive’ causality derived from Leibniz and above all Hegel), ‘structural causality’ made it possible for the first time to think of history as a process deprived of any essence and telos, without subject and without end – or, as Althusser puts it in another formulation, as a ‘structure of structures’ without any centre. [2] It was, therefore, the concept that condensed the anti-humanist reading produced in the 1960s by Althusser and his collaborators, one that soon became famous under the label ‘structural Marxism’.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherRadical Philosophy Group
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.radicalphilosophy.com/article/the-necessity-of-contingency
dc.subjectAlthusser
dc.subjectstructuralism
dc.subjectnecessity
dc.subjectcontingency
dc.subjectSpinoza
dc.titleThe necessity of contingency. Rereading Althusser on structural causality
dc.typeJournal article
dc.identifier.journalRadical Philosophy
dc.date.accepted2016-07-31
rioxxterms.funderJisc
rioxxterms.identifier.projectUoW091116SP
rioxxterms.versionAM
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2016-10-24
dc.source.volume199
dc.source.beginpage15
dc.source.endpage25
refterms.dateFCD2018-10-18T15:53:33Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2018-08-21T13:33:12Z
html.description.abstractAmong the concepts proposed by Althusser in the course of his famous symptomatic reading of Marx’s Capital, structural causality plays a central role. Extrapolated from Marx’s writings via a detour through the philosophy of Spinoza, it came to represent the concept in which Althusser summed up ‘Marx’s immense theoretical revolution’. [1] As is well known, for Althusser, by breaking with the other two models of causality available in Marx’s time (the mechanistic causality derived from Descartes and the ‘expressive’ causality derived from Leibniz and above all Hegel), ‘structural causality’ made it possible for the first time to think of history as a process deprived of any essence and telos, without subject and without end – or, as Althusser puts it in another formulation, as a ‘structure of structures’ without any centre. [2] It was, therefore, the concept that condensed the anti-humanist reading produced in the 1960s by Althusser and his collaborators, one that soon became famous under the label ‘structural Marxism’.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
rp199_article_pippa_necessity_ ...
Size:
336.4Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/CC BY-NC-ND 4.0