Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHenderson, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Tina
dc.contributor.authorAlexanders, Jenny
dc.contributor.authorShaw, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Lois
dc.contributor.authorNevill, Alan
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Anna
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-14T13:46:16Z
dc.date.available2016-10-14T13:46:16Z
dc.date.issued2016-11-26
dc.identifier.citationThe Use of Recovery Strategies Among Participants of the Bupa Great North Run: A Cross-Sectional Survey 2016:1 Journal of Sport Rehabilitation
dc.identifier.issn1056-6716
dc.identifier.doi10.1123/jsr.2016-0029
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/620207
dc.descriptionThis is an accepted manuscript of an article published by Human Kinetics in Journal of Sport Rehabilitation on 26/11/2016, available online: https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2016-0029 The accepted version of the publication may differ from the final published version.en
dc.description.abstractObjective: To investigate half marathon runners’ frequency of use of recovery strategies, perceptions regarding the most beneficial recovery strategy and reasons for using recovery strategies. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Participants: 186 participants of the 13.1 mile BUPA Great North Run 2013. Methods: A questionnaire was developed which required participants to indicate how frequently they used twelve different recovery strategies, identify which recovery strategy they believed to be most beneficial and rank six reasons for using recovery strategies in order of importance. Data was analysed using a Friedman non-parametric ANOVA and additional non-parametric tests. Results: All participants used recovery strategies. Stretching was the most commonly used recovery strategy (p < 0.001), whereas the use of nutritional supplements was the most commonly selected most beneficial recovery strategy. Over 50% of respondents indicated that they never used strategies such as kinesio tape (80%), hydrotherapy (78%) or ice baths (71%). A significant difference was observed between reasons for using recovery strategy (χ2 (5) = 292.29, p < 0.001). Reducing muscle tightness (rank 4.87) and reducing injury (rank 4.35), were the most frequently chosen most important reasons for using recovery strategies, minor sex and age differences in the responses were identified. Conclusion: Recovery strategy usage appears to be widespread among half marathon runners; however disparities exist between the frequency of use and perceived effectiveness of different recovery strategies. Further research in this area is needed to facilitate the development of recovery strategy guidelines which are both evidence-based and practically relevant.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherHuman Kinetics
dc.relation.urlhttp://journals.humankinetics.com/doi/10.1123/jsr.2016-0029
dc.subjectRecovery
dc.subjectRunning
dc.subjectStretching
dc.subjectSurvey
dc.titleThe Use of Recovery Strategies Among Participants of the Bupa Great North Run: A Cross-Sectional Survey
dc.typeJournal article
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Sport Rehabilitation
dc.date.accepted2016-11
rioxxterms.funderJisc
rioxxterms.identifier.project141016TS
rioxxterms.versionAM
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
rioxxterms.licenseref.uri2016-10-14
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2016-140-14
dc.source.volume26
dc.source.issue6
dc.source.beginpage478
dc.source.endpage485
refterms.dateFCD2018-10-19T09:12:35Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2018-08-20T14:15:49Z
html.description.abstractObjective: To investigate half marathon runners’ frequency of use of recovery strategies, perceptions regarding the most beneficial recovery strategy and reasons for using recovery strategies. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Participants: 186 participants of the 13.1 mile BUPA Great North Run 2013. Methods: A questionnaire was developed which required participants to indicate how frequently they used twelve different recovery strategies, identify which recovery strategy they believed to be most beneficial and rank six reasons for using recovery strategies in order of importance. Data was analysed using a Friedman non-parametric ANOVA and additional non-parametric tests. Results: All participants used recovery strategies. Stretching was the most commonly used recovery strategy (p < 0.001), whereas the use of nutritional supplements was the most commonly selected most beneficial recovery strategy. Over 50% of respondents indicated that they never used strategies such as kinesio tape (80%), hydrotherapy (78%) or ice baths (71%). A significant difference was observed between reasons for using recovery strategy (χ2 (5) = 292.29, p < 0.001). Reducing muscle tightness (rank 4.87) and reducing injury (rank 4.35), were the most frequently chosen most important reasons for using recovery strategies, minor sex and age differences in the responses were identified. Conclusion: Recovery strategy usage appears to be widespread among half marathon runners; however disparities exist between the frequency of use and perceived effectiveness of different recovery strategies. Further research in this area is needed to facilitate the development of recovery strategy guidelines which are both evidence-based and practically relevant.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Henderson et al 2016.pdf
Size:
318.4Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/