Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorThelwall, Mike
dc.contributor.authorMaflahi, Nabeil
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-13T09:18:21Z
dc.date.available2016-09-13T09:18:21Z
dc.date.issued2015-01-08
dc.identifier.citationMaflahi, N. and Thelwall, M. (2016), When Are Readers as Good as Citers for Bibliometrics? Scopus vs. Mendeley for LIS Journals. Journal of the Association of Information Science and Technology, 67: pp. 191-199. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23369
dc.identifier.issn2330-1635
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/asi.23369
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/620075
dc.descriptionThis is an accepted manuscript of an article published by Association for Information Science and Technology in Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology on 08/01/2015, available online: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23369 The accepted version of the publication may differ from the final published version.
dc.description.abstractIn theory, articles can attract readers on the social reference sharing site Mendeley before they can attract citations, so Mendeley altmetrics could provide early indications of article impact. This article investigates the influence of time on the number of Mendeley readers of an article through a theoretical discussion and an investigation into the relationship between counts of readers of, and citations to, 4 general library and information science (LIS) journals. For this discipline, it takes about 7 years for articles to attract as many Scopus citations as Mendeley readers, and after this the Spearman correlation between readers and citers is stable at about 0.6 for all years. This suggests that Mendeley readership counts may be useful impact indicators for both newer and older articles. The lack of dates for individual Mendeley article readers and an unknown bias toward more recent articles mean that readership data should be normalized individually by year, however, before making any comparisons between articles published in different years.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell
dc.relation.urlhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.23369/abstract
dc.subjectaltmetrics
dc.subjectMendeley
dc.subjectcitation analysis
dc.subjectalternative indicators
dc.titleWhen are readership counts as useful as citation counts? Scopus versus Mendeley for LIS journals
dc.typeJournal article
dc.identifier.journalJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
dc.date.accepted2014-06-17
dc.source.volume67
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.beginpage191
dc.source.endpage199
refterms.dateFOA2018-08-21T13:24:58Z
html.description.abstractIn theory, articles can attract readers on the social reference sharing site Mendeley before they can attract citations, so Mendeley altmetrics could provide early indications of article impact. This article investigates the influence of time on the number of Mendeley readers of an article through a theoretical discussion and an investigation into the relationship between counts of readers of, and citations to, 4 general library and information science (LIS) journals. For this discipline, it takes about 7 years for articles to attract as many Scopus citations as Mendeley readers, and after this the Spearman correlation between readers and citers is stable at about 0.6 for all years. This suggests that Mendeley readership counts may be useful impact indicators for both newer and older articles. The lack of dates for individual Mendeley article readers and an unknown bias toward more recent articles mean that readership data should be normalized individually by year, however, before making any comparisons between articles published in different years.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
ReadersCiters-preprint.pdf
Size:
796.0Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record