Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNewton, Benjamin John
dc.contributor.authorRothlingova, Zuzana
dc.contributor.authorGutteridge, Robin
dc.contributor.authorLeMarchand, Karen
dc.contributor.authorRaphael, Jon Howard
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-21T10:59:35Zen
dc.date.available2016-06-21T10:59:35Zen
dc.date.issued2012-09
dc.identifier.citationNo room for reflexivity? Critical reflections following a systematic review of qualitative research. 2012, 17 (6):866-85 J Health Psychol
dc.identifier.issn1461-7277
dc.identifier.pmid22147063
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1359105311427615
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/613863
dc.description.abstractWe conducted a systematic search of qualitative research into the individual's experience of chronic low back pain. Two reviewers independently read through 740 unique abstracts. Inter-rater reliability was fair. The final sample comprised 19 articles which we critiqued using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. This article focuses on the critical appraisal. Limitations include a lack of an adequate rationale for the theoretical framework, a lack of an account for the decisions made across recruitment and data collection, and a lack of reflexivity. Finally we discuss and offer recommendations for reflexivity and the explication of qualitative methodology in research articles.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSage
dc.subjectchronic low back pain
dc.subjectcritical appraisal
dc.subjectmethodology
dc.subjectreflexivity
dc.subjectsystematic review
dc.subject.meshData Collection
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshLow Back Pain
dc.subject.meshObserver Variation
dc.subject.meshPatient Selection
dc.subject.meshQualitative Research
dc.subject.meshReproducibility of Results
dc.subject.meshResearch Design
dc.subject.meshReview Literature as Topic
dc.titleNo room for reflexivity? Critical reflections following a systematic review of qualitative research.
dc.typeJournal article
dc.identifier.journalJournal of health psychology
html.description.abstractWe conducted a systematic search of qualitative research into the individual's experience of chronic low back pain. Two reviewers independently read through 740 unique abstracts. Inter-rater reliability was fair. The final sample comprised 19 articles which we critiqued using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. This article focuses on the critical appraisal. Limitations include a lack of an adequate rationale for the theoretical framework, a lack of an account for the decisions made across recruitment and data collection, and a lack of reflexivity. Finally we discuss and offer recommendations for reflexivity and the explication of qualitative methodology in research articles.


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record