No room for reflexivity? Critical reflections following a systematic review of qualitative research.
AuthorsNewton, Benjamin John
Raphael, Jon Howard
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractWe conducted a systematic search of qualitative research into the individual's experience of chronic low back pain. Two reviewers independently read through 740 unique abstracts. Inter-rater reliability was fair. The final sample comprised 19 articles which we critiqued using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. This article focuses on the critical appraisal. Limitations include a lack of an adequate rationale for the theoretical framework, a lack of an account for the decisions made across recruitment and data collection, and a lack of reflexivity. Finally we discuss and offer recommendations for reflexivity and the explication of qualitative methodology in research articles.
CitationNo room for reflexivity? Critical reflections following a systematic review of qualitative research. 2012, 17 (6):866-85 J Health Psychol
JournalJournal of health psychology
- Reflexivity, critical qualitative research and emancipation: a Foucauldian perspective.
- Authors: McCabe JL, Holmes D
- Issue date: 2009 Jul
- An appraisal of the quality of published qualitative dental research.
- Authors: Masood M, Thaliath ET, Bower EJ, Newton JT
- Issue date: 2011 Jun
- Literature review: considerations in undertaking focus group research with culturally and linguistically diverse groups.
- Authors: Halcomb EJ, Gholizadeh L, DiGiacomo M, Phillips J, Davidson PM
- Issue date: 2007 Jun
- Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
- Authors: Manchikanti L, Datta S, Smith HS, Hirsch JA
- Issue date: 2009 Sep-Oct
- Understanding and critiquing qualitative research papers.
- Authors: Lee P
- Issue date: 2006 Jul 18-24