Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDevonport, Tracey
dc.contributor.authorLane, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorFullerton, Christopher L.
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-03T13:53:11Zen
dc.date.available2016-06-03T13:53:11Zen
dc.date.issued2016-03-01
dc.identifier.citationDevonport, T., Lane, A. and Fullerton, C. L. (2016) Introducing Sport Psychology Interventions: Self-Control Implications, The Sport Psychologist 30 (1), pp. 24-29.
dc.identifier.issn0888-4781
dc.identifier.doi10.1123/tsp.2014-0120
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/611689
dc.description.abstractEvidence from sequential-task studies demonstrate that if the first task requires self-control, then performance on the second task is compromised (Hagger, Wood, Stiff, & Chatzisarantis, 2010). In a novel extension of previous sequential-task research, the first self-control task in the current study was a sport psychology intervention, paradoxically proposed to be associated with improved performance. Eighteen participants (9 males, 9 females; mean age = 21.6 years, SD = 1.6), none of whom had previously performed the experimental task or motor imagery, were randomly assigned to an imagery condition or a control condition. After the collection of pretest data, participants completed the same 5-week physical training program designed to enhance swimming tumble-turn performance. Results indicated that performance improved significantly among participants from both conditions with no significant intervention effect. Hence, in contrast to expected findings from application of the imagery literature, there was no additive effect after an intervention. We suggest practitioners should be cognisant of the potential effects of sequential tasks, and future research is needed to investigate this line of research.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherHuman Kinetics journals
dc.relation.urlhttps://journals.humankinetics.com/doi/abs/10.1123/tsp.2014-0120
dc.subjectsequential task
dc.subjectmotor imagery
dc.subjectskill acquisition
dc.subjecthuman performance
dc.titleIntroducing Sport Psychology Interventions: Self-Control Implications
dc.typeJournal article
dc.identifier.journalThe Sport Psychologist
dc.source.volume30
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.beginpage24
dc.source.endpage29
refterms.dateFOA2018-08-21T12:55:37Z
html.description.abstractEvidence from sequential-task studies demonstrate that if the first task requires self-control, then performance on the second task is compromised (Hagger, Wood, Stiff, & Chatzisarantis, 2010). In a novel extension of previous sequential-task research, the first self-control task in the current study was a sport psychology intervention, paradoxically proposed to be associated with improved performance. Eighteen participants (9 males, 9 females; mean age = 21.6 years, SD = 1.6), none of whom had previously performed the experimental task or motor imagery, were randomly assigned to an imagery condition or a control condition. After the collection of pretest data, participants completed the same 5-week physical training program designed to enhance swimming tumble-turn performance. Results indicated that performance improved significantly among participants from both conditions with no significant intervention effect. Hence, in contrast to expected findings from application of the imagery literature, there was no additive effect after an intervention. We suggest practitioners should be cognisant of the potential effects of sequential tasks, and future research is needed to investigate this line of research.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Devonport TSP_2014-0120_wg.pdf
Size:
408.1Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record