Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAltintzoglou, Evripidis
dc.contributor.editorAltintzoglou, Euripides
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-18T14:25:48Zen
dc.date.available2016-05-18T14:25:48Zen
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationAltintzoglou, E. (2016) Deflowered Revolution: An Ethical Examination of Neo-Liberal Tactics of Pacification, in Altintzoglou, E. and Fredriksson, M. (eds), Revolt & Revolution: The Protester in the 21st Century. Leiden: Brill, pp. 23-32.
dc.identifier.isbn9781848884564
dc.identifier.doi10.1163/9781848884564_004
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/609606
dc.descriptionOriginally published 2016 by Inter-Disciplinary Press.
dc.description.abstractDuring the last two decades we have become familiar with new forms of protest. These new types of protest direct their discontent towards the system in ways that involve the general public, trying to affect change by spreading the feeling of discontent so that governments succumb to wider pressure. These forms of protest are radically different from a strike at a factory or a mine in that they do not affect only those immediately involved – e.g. the owner of a business or multinational companies and government bodies. To a certain extent radical forms of protest such as rioting and looting share this principle. More recently, the Tottenham riots (London, UK) led to widespread looting of retail stores and were heavily criticized for being driven by consumerist desire. This was the view propagated by the media, government officials and surprisingly by leading voices of the left (Bauman, Žižek, Hall). Although we should not be hasty in dismissing looting, we should question the nature of the tactics of any forms of protest that allow themselves to become suspiciously linked with consumerist desire. This is so, because the claim that a desire for goods is the overriding determining factor here aims precisely at deflating the political significance of these riots. By employing Alain Badiou’s model of Ethics we are in a position to deal with the root of the problem: what allows for riots that involve looting to be susceptible to the Evils (privations) posed by the accusations of being associated with consumerist desire? What does a public unrest of this nature need in order to avoid ideological demeaning (accusations of consumerist desire) and sustain their fidelity to revolutionary Truth?
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherInter-Disciplinary Press
dc.relation.urlhttps://brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9781848884564/BP000004.xml
dc.subjectProtest
dc.subjectriot
dc.subjectrevolt
dc.subjectlooting
dc.subjectBadiou
dc.subjectBauman
dc.subjectethics
dc.subjecttruth
dc.subjectŽižek
dc.subjectHall
dc.subjectTottenham Riots
dc.titleDeflowered Revolution: An Ethical Examination of Neo-Liberal Tactics of Pacification
dc.typeChapter in book
pubs.edition1st
pubs.place-of-publicationLeiden
dc.source.beginpage23
dc.source.endpage32
refterms.dateFOA2018-08-21T12:53:44Z
html.description.abstractDuring the last two decades we have become familiar with new forms of protest. These new types of protest direct their discontent towards the system in ways that involve the general public, trying to affect change by spreading the feeling of discontent so that governments succumb to wider pressure. These forms of protest are radically different from a strike at a factory or a mine in that they do not affect only those immediately involved – e.g. the owner of a business or multinational companies and government bodies. To a certain extent radical forms of protest such as rioting and looting share this principle. More recently, the Tottenham riots (London, UK) led to widespread looting of retail stores and were heavily criticized for being driven by consumerist desire. This was the view propagated by the media, government officials and surprisingly by leading voices of the left (Bauman, Žižek, Hall). Although we should not be hasty in dismissing looting, we should question the nature of the tactics of any forms of protest that allow themselves to become suspiciously linked with consumerist desire. This is so, because the claim that a desire for goods is the overriding determining factor here aims precisely at deflating the political significance of these riots. By employing Alain Badiou’s model of Ethics we are in a position to deal with the root of the problem: what allows for riots that involve looting to be susceptible to the Evils (privations) posed by the accusations of being associated with consumerist desire? What does a public unrest of this nature need in order to avoid ideological demeaning (accusations of consumerist desire) and sustain their fidelity to revolutionary Truth?


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Euripides Altintzoglou - Deflowered ...
Size:
233.2Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record